<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With the 117th pick of the draft &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2006/04/30/with-the-117th-pick-of-the-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2006/04/30/with-the-117th-pick-of-the-draft/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rschles</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2006/04/30/with-the-117th-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>rschles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejetsblog.com/?p=624#comment-278</guid>
		<description>The Jets were fine not to draft a &quot;running back of the future&quot; this year. Here&#039;s why:
- Top flight RBs have an NFL life-span of probably six years.
- RB is probably the position at which a rookie is most capable of contributing at a high level immediately.
- The Jets will will be lucky to win six games this year.
Given those three suppositions, it would make no sense to spend a high draft pick on a stud RB. Why waste one of his six years of top-level performance in a season that you&#039;re not going to compete anyway. (WRs and QBs, by contrast, need a few years to develop, so you take them now with an eye towards them stepping up in two or three years.)
Look for the Jets to select a stud RB in the first two rounds next season, in what will hopefully prove to be the finall piece needed for competitiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jets were fine not to draft a &#8220;running back of the future&#8221; this year. Here&#39;s why:<br />
- Top flight RBs have an NFL life-span of probably six years.<br />
- RB is probably the position at which a rookie is most capable of contributing at a high level immediately.<br />
- The Jets will will be lucky to win six games this year.<br />
Given those three suppositions, it would make no sense to spend a high draft pick on a stud RB. Why waste one of his six years of top-level performance in a season that you&#39;re not going to compete anyway. (WRs and QBs, by contrast, need a few years to develop, so you take them now with an eye towards them stepping up in two or three years.)<br />
Look for the Jets to select a stud RB in the first two rounds next season, in what will hopefully prove to be the finall piece needed for competitiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 224/225 objects using memcached

Served from: www.thejetsblog.com @ 2012-02-12 07:31:47 -->
