<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Pick Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:59:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Smith :-)</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-65072</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Smith :-)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-65072</guid>
		<description>Should the Jets trade Pennington?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the Jets trade Pennington?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolas</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64640</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64640</guid>
		<description>Fire all of them now that there is still time. Tannenbaum first, Mangini second. These kids are not only unprofessional they are  stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fire all of them now that there is still time. Tannenbaum first, Mangini second. These kids are not only unprofessional they are  stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bassett</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64587</link>
		<dc:creator>Bassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64587</guid>
		<description>seems you guys are right, i was going by nfl.com and the wins weren&#039;t updated ... cheers

as far as I can tell, the game tonight is then meaningless and OAK&#039;s SoS would still be higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems you guys are right, i was going by nfl.com and the wins weren&#8217;t updated &#8230; cheers</p>
<p>as far as I can tell, the game tonight is then meaningless and OAK&#8217;s SoS would still be higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64585</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64585</guid>
		<description>Oakland has 131 too, not 130 with both teams playing tonight, so they will be at 132.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oakland has 131 too, not 130 with both teams playing tonight, so they will be at 132.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64584</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64584</guid>
		<description>The Jets have 132 opponent wins with Tennessee going tonight not 133.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jets have 132 opponent wins with Tennessee going tonight not 133.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbi</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64583</link>
		<dc:creator>mbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64583</guid>
		<description>Do the jets have any extra picks by any chance?  Just wondering, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the jets have any extra picks by any chance?  Just wondering, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R in CT</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64582</link>
		<dc:creator>R in CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64582</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, SNY Jets Post Game kept saying the Jets are picking 6th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, SNY Jets Post Game kept saying the Jets are picking 6th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed(itor)</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64580</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed(itor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64580</guid>
		<description>I hate to tell you this, but I have the JETS picking 5th not 6th.  Please recheck your math or your sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to tell you this, but I have the JETS picking 5th not 6th.  Please recheck your math or your sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64579</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64579</guid>
		<description>I counted KC&#039;s opponents wins below and they equal 131, not 127

Hou - 8
Chi - 7
Minn - 8
SD -11
Jax - 11
Cin -7
Oak - 4
GB - 13
Den - 7
Indy -13
Oak - 4
SD - 11
Den - 7
Tenn - 9
Det - 7
NYJ - 4

Add that up and it equals 131, not 127.  Unless I&#039;m a complete dope, your numbers are wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I counted KC&#8217;s opponents wins below and they equal 131, not 127</p>
<p>Hou &#8211; 8<br />
Chi &#8211; 7<br />
Minn &#8211; 8<br />
SD -11<br />
Jax &#8211; 11<br />
Cin -7<br />
Oak &#8211; 4<br />
GB &#8211; 13<br />
Den &#8211; 7<br />
Indy -13<br />
Oak &#8211; 4<br />
SD &#8211; 11<br />
Den &#8211; 7<br />
Tenn &#8211; 9<br />
Det &#8211; 7<br />
NYJ &#8211; 4</p>
<p>Add that up and it equals 131, not 127.  Unless I&#8217;m a complete dope, your numbers are wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2007/12/30/draft-pick-update/comment-page-1/#comment-64578</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3201#comment-64578</guid>
		<description>Are you sure its #6? Where did you get the strength of schedule update?  I went through all the teams at 4-12 and added up the wins and losses and I came up with Oakland, KC and Atlanta having identical SOS records with the Jets 1/2 game ahead, meaning if Tennessee wins the Jets would be tied with the other four teams, but if Tennessee loses the Jets would have the worse SOS record and therefore be #3.  
I&#039;m not sure how I did it wrong, its definately possible, but I&#039;m curious where you got your info

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure its #6? Where did you get the strength of schedule update?  I went through all the teams at 4-12 and added up the wins and losses and I came up with Oakland, KC and Atlanta having identical SOS records with the Jets 1/2 game ahead, meaning if Tennessee wins the Jets would be tied with the other four teams, but if Tennessee loses the Jets would have the worse SOS record and therefore be #3.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure how I did it wrong, its definately possible, but I&#8217;m curious where you got your info</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
