<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link: AP Series (Pt. 1) on Darren McFadden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78177</guid>
		<description>Since you asked, Brad, I will give my views on your picks...

1- GHOLSTON/ McFadden - I&#039;ll leave this alone, as it&#039;s already been done to death

CB- JENKINS, Cromartie, Mckelvin/ Trade down - I like Jenkins, but I don&#039;t think he would be worth taking as high as 6.  Maybe if we trade down.  The corners (including Talib) are all pretty closely grouped, so taking one a bit later if possible would be preferable.

2- CB- lee, porter, king or WR- Kelly or Hardy or OT – Carl Nicks or Sam Baker - I like the depth at the corner position here a lot.  Add Cason (who the Jets apparently like) to this group.  A big, fast or big and fast WR (or maybe an athletic pass catching TE) would be great, but Kelly and Hardy have issues.  I think Hardy might go in the 20s anyway.  Nicks might be available in the 3rd or 4th but I think his off-field issues are overblown.  Not sure they need a tackle that badly and might draft a project later on, but I hope they get one (preferably a versatile one) at some point.

4- WR- Jordy Nelson (might not be available), Marcus Monk - See above.  These are good selections, although Monk has knee issues.  Maybe someone like Hubbard could fall here too?
4- DE- Kendall Langford - Definitely someone the Jets will have considered.

As for my views on who they should pick, I think there are some good options to fill needs in every round.  It just depends in what order they have prioritised their needs.  As long as they fill the main needs (as identified by you) and get decent value, I&#039;ll be relaxed about whoever they get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you asked, Brad, I will give my views on your picks&#8230;</p>
<p>1- GHOLSTON/ McFadden &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave this alone, as it&#8217;s already been done to death</p>
<p>CB- JENKINS, Cromartie, Mckelvin/ Trade down &#8211; I like Jenkins, but I don&#8217;t think he would be worth taking as high as 6.  Maybe if we trade down.  The corners (including Talib) are all pretty closely grouped, so taking one a bit later if possible would be preferable.</p>
<p>2- CB- lee, porter, king or WR- Kelly or Hardy or OT – Carl Nicks or Sam Baker &#8211; I like the depth at the corner position here a lot.  Add Cason (who the Jets apparently like) to this group.  A big, fast or big and fast WR (or maybe an athletic pass catching TE) would be great, but Kelly and Hardy have issues.  I think Hardy might go in the 20s anyway.  Nicks might be available in the 3rd or 4th but I think his off-field issues are overblown.  Not sure they need a tackle that badly and might draft a project later on, but I hope they get one (preferably a versatile one) at some point.</p>
<p>4- WR- Jordy Nelson (might not be available), Marcus Monk &#8211; See above.  These are good selections, although Monk has knee issues.  Maybe someone like Hubbard could fall here too?<br />
4- DE- Kendall Langford &#8211; Definitely someone the Jets will have considered.</p>
<p>As for my views on who they should pick, I think there are some good options to fill needs in every round.  It just depends in what order they have prioritised their needs.  As long as they fill the main needs (as identified by you) and get decent value, I&#8217;ll be relaxed about whoever they get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78167</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78167</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bent for th info! I like Kendall Langford anyways. hope he will be there in the fourth round! what do u think about my other picks and opinions? who would u like to see them draft witht their first four picks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bent for th info! I like Kendall Langford anyways. hope he will be there in the fourth round! what do u think about my other picks and opinions? who would u like to see them draft witht their first four picks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvv</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78133</link>
		<dc:creator>billvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78133</guid>
		<description>He&#039;ll run laps for every lapse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;ll run laps for every lapse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78132</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome, Brad.  What I forgot to mention is that Tyson Jackson decided to stay in school so he is not an option in the fourth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Brad.  What I forgot to mention is that Tyson Jackson decided to stay in school so he is not an option in the fourth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78100</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78100</guid>
		<description>By the way, my last name is McFadden. No relation. Can&#039;t wait to switch my screen name to Bigmac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, my last name is McFadden. No relation. Can&#8217;t wait to switch my screen name to Bigmac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78099</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78099</guid>
		<description>It was the coaching that fixed it, Brad, when Fassel left and TC took over. If you don&#039;t think the coaching staff is up to the challenge, then we are in deep...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the coaching that fixed it, Brad, when Fassel left and TC took over. If you don&#8217;t think the coaching staff is up to the challenge, then we are in deep&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78093</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78093</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments guys! I am not a McFadden hater, just the fumble issue is a major concern about McFadden and i havent heard many address. Just wanted to hear some opinions about it. But once again, should be correctable, but how soon. It could take a couple of seasons. It is possible that he will fumble the ball 5-8X in each of his first couple of season. Also probable that he will get at least 10 TD in each of his first couple of seasons. Just saying that if we have Kellen Clemens as QB and McFadden at RB, there is going to be a lot of turnovers on offense each game. Is that what we want for the team in the near future after going on this off season/ free agent spending spree? Long term he can fix the fumble issue and be great, but by that time his contract might be soon up and we will have to pay him big bucks to stay long term. How long did it take Tiki to fix it? It could take him a good 2-3 seasons to totally resolve this issue and than a year or two later he will be a free agent. Is he really worth it  that high in the draft when we have other issues that need to be addressed? That is the debate, my question, my concern!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys! I am not a McFadden hater, just the fumble issue is a major concern about McFadden and i havent heard many address. Just wanted to hear some opinions about it. But once again, should be correctable, but how soon. It could take a couple of seasons. It is possible that he will fumble the ball 5-8X in each of his first couple of season. Also probable that he will get at least 10 TD in each of his first couple of seasons. Just saying that if we have Kellen Clemens as QB and McFadden at RB, there is going to be a lot of turnovers on offense each game. Is that what we want for the team in the near future after going on this off season/ free agent spending spree? Long term he can fix the fumble issue and be great, but by that time his contract might be soon up and we will have to pay him big bucks to stay long term. How long did it take Tiki to fix it? It could take him a good 2-3 seasons to totally resolve this issue and than a year or two later he will be a free agent. Is he really worth it  that high in the draft when we have other issues that need to be addressed? That is the debate, my question, my concern!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78087</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78087</guid>
		<description>Rich - yes, I noticed that he holds the ball in his left hand all the time too.  Is this a problem?  Yes, when he runs up the middle or to the right.  I assume he has always done this and likes to use the right hand to stiff arm people.

My guess is that nobody bothered to force him to correct it in highschool or college, because he was SO dominant, it was worth the risk, because he didn&#039;t take a clean hit as often, whereas giving him something extra to think about in terms of carrying the ball, might have had a short term impact on his vision and decisiveness.

In the NFL, they will definitely correct him on it.  If he starts protecting the ball properly without compromising his running ability then this would be a good thing.  It is also positive that his high fumble numbers may be in part due to a correctable weakness.

Brad - see above.  I agree it&#039;s a big problem, but potentially correctable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8211; yes, I noticed that he holds the ball in his left hand all the time too.  Is this a problem?  Yes, when he runs up the middle or to the right.  I assume he has always done this and likes to use the right hand to stiff arm people.</p>
<p>My guess is that nobody bothered to force him to correct it in highschool or college, because he was SO dominant, it was worth the risk, because he didn&#8217;t take a clean hit as often, whereas giving him something extra to think about in terms of carrying the ball, might have had a short term impact on his vision and decisiveness.</p>
<p>In the NFL, they will definitely correct him on it.  If he starts protecting the ball properly without compromising his running ability then this would be a good thing.  It is also positive that his high fumble numbers may be in part due to a correctable weakness.</p>
<p>Brad &#8211; see above.  I agree it&#8217;s a big problem, but potentially correctable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GREEN HORNET</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78074</link>
		<dc:creator>GREEN HORNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78074</guid>
		<description>I was about to go off on this ED L guy, but thanks to a true Gentleman like Mr. Kurt I don&#039;t have to. Ed L remember that Giants drafted QB 1st overall (traded up), TE 1st rd, their 1st, 3rd and 4th reciever in the first rd, and Toomer 2nd (as was Tiki). Plus their OL is either first round pics or high price free agent additions (like our K. McKenzie). Than you add a &quot;touch above average&quot; D and there you have it. 

Anyway I have been visiting this site for a while and this is my first post, so let&#039;s go JETS and let&#039;s go for the whole ball of wax this time, McFADDEN !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to go off on this ED L guy, but thanks to a true Gentleman like Mr. Kurt I don&#8217;t have to. Ed L remember that Giants drafted QB 1st overall (traded up), TE 1st rd, their 1st, 3rd and 4th reciever in the first rd, and Toomer 2nd (as was Tiki). Plus their OL is either first round pics or high price free agent additions (like our K. McKenzie). Than you add a &#8220;touch above average&#8221; D and there you have it. </p>
<p>Anyway I have been visiting this site for a while and this is my first post, so let&#8217;s go JETS and let&#8217;s go for the whole ball of wax this time, McFADDEN !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/15/link-arkansas-star-article-on-darren-mcfadden/#comment-78068</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=3925#comment-78068</guid>
		<description>The bottom line is taking the best player available regardless of position and/or need(Kicker/punter/multiple QB&#039;s being an exception). 

Perhaps in the long run &quot;defense wins championships&quot;, or at least soundly helps the cause...but nothing builds a winner better than depth, competition, and overall roster talent. The only way to ensure that is by drafting the best player available throughout the draft on a yearly basis.

According to Gil Brandt, DMAC is #1 on 21 of NFL gm draft boards. I can promise you he&#039;s # 3 at the lowest for all the other teams. Odds are the jets are one of the 21 teams. The jets, like every other team, pay their scouts alot of money year round to go to games, The CS, Tanny, Bradway and Clinkscale spend countless hours after the super bowl watching film, interviewing, and deliberating a clear cut big board...why would they waste every second of that if you dont plan on staying true to your evaluation/ranking system?

At # 6, all we can ask for is a guy that is among the best available and helps the team from the get go. DMAC currently is pegged as the best player available , he immediately adds depth, competition, schematic options, and a long term answer after Jones. 

Sounds like a no brainer to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line is taking the best player available regardless of position and/or need(Kicker/punter/multiple QB&#8217;s being an exception). </p>
<p>Perhaps in the long run &#8220;defense wins championships&#8221;, or at least soundly helps the cause&#8230;but nothing builds a winner better than depth, competition, and overall roster talent. The only way to ensure that is by drafting the best player available throughout the draft on a yearly basis.</p>
<p>According to Gil Brandt, DMAC is #1 on 21 of NFL gm draft boards. I can promise you he&#8217;s # 3 at the lowest for all the other teams. Odds are the jets are one of the 21 teams. The jets, like every other team, pay their scouts alot of money year round to go to games, The CS, Tanny, Bradway and Clinkscale spend countless hours after the super bowl watching film, interviewing, and deliberating a clear cut big board&#8230;why would they waste every second of that if you dont plan on staying true to your evaluation/ranking system?</p>
<p>At # 6, all we can ask for is a guy that is among the best available and helps the team from the get go. DMAC currently is pegged as the best player available , he immediately adds depth, competition, schematic options, and a long term answer after Jones. </p>
<p>Sounds like a no brainer to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 314/331 objects using memcached

Served from: www.thejetsblog.com @ 2012-02-12 12:48:15 -->
