<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jets Pick Trade Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:59:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lovethisgame</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80765</link>
		<dc:creator>lovethisgame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80765</guid>
		<description>Dont forget that the Seattle Seahawks took a TE just a few picks later so if it wasn&#039;t the Giants then I&#039;m sure the Seahawks would have jumped in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont forget that the Seattle Seahawks took a TE just a few picks later so if it wasn&#8217;t the Giants then I&#8217;m sure the Seahawks would have jumped in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlan Lachman</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80752</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlan Lachman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80752</guid>
		<description>Ramble914 please reread what I wrote.

Gholston: We were stuck. All the top talent was off the board except for Gholston and no one offered enough to move up. I think the Pats trade down saved them very little money, may have cost them a better LB (Rivers vs Mayo), all for a #3 less a #5. I am the one who documented that Gholston was not a player whose stock rose precipitously as a result of great combine workouts. His rating and ranking did not significantly change so while inconsistent, he was not a reach.

Keller: While I hate the idea of giving up an early 4th round pick (because as others have pointed up we have done well in this round even in less well stocked drafts,) I am the one who pointed out that 1) there was no WR on the board worth taking and that 2) he was not a reach and if he performed as well as Dallas Clark we would all think it a great move. Remembering our TE fiascos does not mean one hates every pick. It just means all one&#039;s brain cells have not died.

AFAIK, Rhodes is a S, not a CB. There is no CB chosen in rounds 4 or 5 in my recent memory (unfortunately, a lot of brain cells have died) who has started and excelled for this team in quite a while. A S might have been a good pick too. As with ILBs, some speed can be sacrificed for being in the right place at the right time and hitting hard. I stand by my belief that this part of the draft has values in players from small schools, changing position or at positions not requiring as much speed (OG, ILB, S).

And Mike, I guess that means you think Gholston was a workout wonder and is not a good football player, there was a WR we should have taken instead of Keller, we should have traded back for less than a third round pick in the first round, etc. Frankly, if Bent, Bassett, R or others who have repeatedly posted brilliantly wrote that they disagree with almost everything I say, I would be saddened. In your case, I suspect it just means you like being wrong.

harlan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramble914 please reread what I wrote.</p>
<p>Gholston: We were stuck. All the top talent was off the board except for Gholston and no one offered enough to move up. I think the Pats trade down saved them very little money, may have cost them a better LB (Rivers vs Mayo), all for a #3 less a #5. I am the one who documented that Gholston was not a player whose stock rose precipitously as a result of great combine workouts. His rating and ranking did not significantly change so while inconsistent, he was not a reach.</p>
<p>Keller: While I hate the idea of giving up an early 4th round pick (because as others have pointed up we have done well in this round even in less well stocked drafts,) I am the one who pointed out that 1) there was no WR on the board worth taking and that 2) he was not a reach and if he performed as well as Dallas Clark we would all think it a great move. Remembering our TE fiascos does not mean one hates every pick. It just means all one&#8217;s brain cells have not died.</p>
<p>AFAIK, Rhodes is a S, not a CB. There is no CB chosen in rounds 4 or 5 in my recent memory (unfortunately, a lot of brain cells have died) who has started and excelled for this team in quite a while. A S might have been a good pick too. As with ILBs, some speed can be sacrificed for being in the right place at the right time and hitting hard. I stand by my belief that this part of the draft has values in players from small schools, changing position or at positions not requiring as much speed (OG, ILB, S).</p>
<p>And Mike, I guess that means you think Gholston was a workout wonder and is not a good football player, there was a WR we should have taken instead of Keller, we should have traded back for less than a third round pick in the first round, etc. Frankly, if Bent, Bassett, R or others who have repeatedly posted brilliantly wrote that they disagree with almost everything I say, I would be saddened. In your case, I suspect it just means you like being wrong.</p>
<p>harlan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80687</guid>
		<description>Harlan, i disagree with almost everything you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan, i disagree with almost everything you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramble914</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80686</link>
		<dc:creator>ramble914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80686</guid>
		<description>We should stock up on OL for the rest of the picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should stock up on OL for the rest of the picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramble914</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80680</link>
		<dc:creator>ramble914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80680</guid>
		<description>Harlan,

Really, you have hated every pick? Whats your problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan,</p>
<p>Really, you have hated every pick? Whats your problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramble914</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80671</link>
		<dc:creator>ramble914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80671</guid>
		<description>Nickolas,

From what I’ve read, heard and understand, the Giants were in serious negotiations with the Saints to trade Shockey for 2nd and 5th round picks. The Giants didn’t think it was enough, and broke off talks Friday afternoon. The talks resumed again yesterday at around the 25th pick when the Saints upped the offer to 2nd and 4th round picks, the Giants were going to accept but wait until their pick at 32 to select Keller as a pass catching replacement for Shockey, but the Jets caught wind of it and jumped in front of them to snag Keller for themselves. Nice move!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nickolas,</p>
<p>From what I’ve read, heard and understand, the Giants were in serious negotiations with the Saints to trade Shockey for 2nd and 5th round picks. The Giants didn’t think it was enough, and broke off talks Friday afternoon. The talks resumed again yesterday at around the 25th pick when the Saints upped the offer to 2nd and 4th round picks, the Giants were going to accept but wait until their pick at 32 to select Keller as a pass catching replacement for Shockey, but the Jets caught wind of it and jumped in front of them to snag Keller for themselves. Nice move!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOZ THE JET</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80651</link>
		<dc:creator>HOZ THE JET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80651</guid>
		<description>this cb is big with good hands harlan you may grow to like this kid later you always have to like a playmaker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this cb is big with good hands harlan you may grow to like this kid later you always have to like a playmaker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvv</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80639</link>
		<dc:creator>billvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80639</guid>
		<description>Harlan, you haven&#039;t liked anything so far.  What&#039;s up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan, you haven&#8217;t liked anything so far.  What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolas</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80638</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80638</guid>
		<description>I love Dustin Keller. He was the top TE and a playmaker; But I think we could have draft him at 36. I do not see how the Giants would have draft him and sent Suckey to New Orleans. The only team that could have jumped infront of us to get him was Seattle.
Lowery is also a good CB, but by sacrificing the fourth rounder we had to gamble on  Bell or Branch. Oakland and Cleveland did it to us.
Now let&#039;s hope we can get some good players in the later rounds. Priority, ILB , OL, S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Dustin Keller. He was the top TE and a playmaker; But I think we could have draft him at 36. I do not see how the Giants would have draft him and sent Suckey to New Orleans. The only team that could have jumped infront of us to get him was Seattle.<br />
Lowery is also a good CB, but by sacrificing the fourth rounder we had to gamble on  Bell or Branch. Oakland and Cleveland did it to us.<br />
Now let&#8217;s hope we can get some good players in the later rounds. Priority, ILB , OL, S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/jets-pick-trade-details/comment-page-1/#comment-80637</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4080#comment-80637</guid>
		<description>d. coleman too, I knew I left out someone recent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>d. coleman too, I knew I left out someone recent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
