http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/ Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:20:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80867 Damian Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:07:52 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80867 Johnny Styne, Stuckey runs 4.49 but quicker than fast. Johnny Styne, Stuckey runs 4.49 but quicker than fast.

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80862 Johnny Styne Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:57:17 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80862 How fast really is Stuckey? Once Chad goes down, will he be able to run in stride underneath Clemens' bombs? How fast really is Stuckey? Once Chad goes down, will he be able to run in stride underneath Clemens’ bombs?

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80858 Damian Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:22 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80858 Fitzgerald Fitzgerald

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80857 Damian Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:22:54 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80857 Fitzgeral gets by with 4.55 pretty well. Fitzgeral gets by with 4.55 pretty well.

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80856 Mike G Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:19:50 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80856 4.56 is solid speed for a wide receiver, but not fast. 4.3 is fast 4.56 is solid speed for a wide receiver, but not fast. 4.3 is fast

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80855 klecko71 Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:15:38 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80855 4.56 is "not very fast"????????????? 4.56 is “not very fast”?????????????

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80853 Mike G Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:03:32 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80853 i though dustin keller was supposed to be out marques colston? but seriously, i like this pick. This guys played in a big conferense, hes got great size and athleticism, and could develop into a solid receiver. i though dustin keller was supposed to be out marques colston? but seriously, i like this pick. This guys played in a big conferense, hes got great size and athleticism, and could develop into a solid receiver.

]]> http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/27/with-the-171st-pick-of-the-draft/#comment-80851 Damian Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:56:44 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4088#comment-80851 Great potential because of size. Could be our Marques Colston. Great potential because of size. Could be our Marques Colston.

]]>