<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erik Ainge &#8220;Couldn&#8217;t Be Happier&#8221; About the Jets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81235</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81235</guid>
		<description>I love this pick. Had to be made. Cole over at Yahoo agrees with some here that this was a wasted pick. I just sent him the following question:

Do you have a sports editor who looks at your work before it’s published? I mean, calling Ainge a wasted pick has to be the most ignorant comment by a “professional” that I’ve read thus far on the ’08 draft. Aside from the fact that the Jets need a 3rd QB, the kid hasn’t even reported to the facility yet, and you have no idea how good or bad he will be. No clue. Odds are he’s a flyer pick, but to say it was a waste of a pick is just dead wrong. Why sign a retread whose limits are well known, when you can roll the dice on finding the next Tom Brady, and fill a roster need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this pick. Had to be made. Cole over at Yahoo agrees with some here that this was a wasted pick. I just sent him the following question:</p>
<p>Do you have a sports editor who looks at your work before it’s published? I mean, calling Ainge a wasted pick has to be the most ignorant comment by a “professional” that I’ve read thus far on the ’08 draft. Aside from the fact that the Jets need a 3rd QB, the kid hasn’t even reported to the facility yet, and you have no idea how good or bad he will be. No clue. Odds are he’s a flyer pick, but to say it was a waste of a pick is just dead wrong. Why sign a retread whose limits are well known, when you can roll the dice on finding the next Tom Brady, and fill a roster need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81223</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81223</guid>
		<description>Ainge is a project, he needs to get stronger, but he has lots of potential.  The ESPN guys noted that he didn&#039;t have the usual array of weapons his senior year, but still had a very good season.  Besides the 31 TDs to only 10 INTs, he was sacked just 3 times in 519 attempts...that&#039;s sick.  And, he had a 7 TD game on the road at Kentucky to go with a good bowl win against Wisconsin.  He also had an excellent Senior Bowl, leading the South to a last second win:

Holding a 16-10 lead, North coach Lane Kiffin of the Raiders opted to go for it on 4th-and-1 from the South 14. Cal RB Justin Forsett was stopped for no gain, though, leaving a window open for Ainge. He completed six passes, including an 18-yarder to on fourth-and-10 from the South&#039;s 14, as his team marched 86 yards in 2:48.

Will he pan out?  I think he will and it&#039;s tough to go wrong with a tall accurate QB from a great conference and a good program.  For a 5th round pick?!?  A steal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ainge is a project, he needs to get stronger, but he has lots of potential.  The ESPN guys noted that he didn&#8217;t have the usual array of weapons his senior year, but still had a very good season.  Besides the 31 TDs to only 10 INTs, he was sacked just 3 times in 519 attempts&#8230;that&#8217;s sick.  And, he had a 7 TD game on the road at Kentucky to go with a good bowl win against Wisconsin.  He also had an excellent Senior Bowl, leading the South to a last second win:</p>
<p>Holding a 16-10 lead, North coach Lane Kiffin of the Raiders opted to go for it on 4th-and-1 from the South 14. Cal RB Justin Forsett was stopped for no gain, though, leaving a window open for Ainge. He completed six passes, including an 18-yarder to on fourth-and-10 from the South&#8217;s 14, as his team marched 86 yards in 2:48.</p>
<p>Will he pan out?  I think he will and it&#8217;s tough to go wrong with a tall accurate QB from a great conference and a good program.  For a 5th round pick?!?  A steal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gastonater</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81216</link>
		<dc:creator>gastonater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81216</guid>
		<description>Colt Brennan got decimated by a defense that Ainge picked apart year after year.  SEC competition is the best there is.  With his size and stature, he was worth the risk in the 5th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colt Brennan got decimated by a defense that Ainge picked apart year after year.  SEC competition is the best there is.  With his size and stature, he was worth the risk in the 5th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjfalcon2001</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81188</link>
		<dc:creator>sjfalcon2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81188</guid>
		<description>I think the Ainge pick is a good pick, low risk = low expectations=higher reward if he turns out to be the next Tom Brady (and before everyone jumps on me, no I&#039;m not suggesting that he is).  And because he is low risk, if he doesn&#039;t pan out, we didn&#039;t give up much to get him, so I am okay with that.  Looking at the limited film I have seen on him, he looks like a younger Chad with a slightly stronger but less accurate arm.

The other reason I am okay with this is Clemens.  I still think Clemens will be our starter, but he already has a ton of pressure given last year, do you really think adding a Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco or Brian Brohm would make things any better?  You think the back pages were bad last year over Chad vs. Clemens, what do you think would happen if you added a new top pick QB to the mix?  Not to mention our salary chart would be too heavy at QB because you&#039;d basically be paying three starter&#039;s salaries at once.  This gives Clemens a year to deveop and show what he&#039;s got and if it doesn&#039;t pan out then, then I agree you move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Ainge pick is a good pick, low risk = low expectations=higher reward if he turns out to be the next Tom Brady (and before everyone jumps on me, no I&#8217;m not suggesting that he is).  And because he is low risk, if he doesn&#8217;t pan out, we didn&#8217;t give up much to get him, so I am okay with that.  Looking at the limited film I have seen on him, he looks like a younger Chad with a slightly stronger but less accurate arm.</p>
<p>The other reason I am okay with this is Clemens.  I still think Clemens will be our starter, but he already has a ton of pressure given last year, do you really think adding a Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco or Brian Brohm would make things any better?  You think the back pages were bad last year over Chad vs. Clemens, what do you think would happen if you added a new top pick QB to the mix?  Not to mention our salary chart would be too heavy at QB because you&#8217;d basically be paying three starter&#8217;s salaries at once.  This gives Clemens a year to deveop and show what he&#8217;s got and if it doesn&#8217;t pan out then, then I agree you move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81124</link>
		<dc:creator>swizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81124</guid>
		<description>Woodson has a terrible release and will struggle in the Pros. As for Colt Brennan, he basically throws sidearm, meaning he is more prone to hit his lineman in the ass than hit an open receiver, not to mention if the twig ever gets hit, better have a helicopter nearby. 

Kris Jenkins is definitely better than any option the Jets would have had in the 3rd round this year, so that was an excellent move by the Jets. Nobody expects Ainge to pan out more than a backup and if he does then the Jets lucked out, dont forget his weapons were pretty bad down in Tenn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodson has a terrible release and will struggle in the Pros. As for Colt Brennan, he basically throws sidearm, meaning he is more prone to hit his lineman in the ass than hit an open receiver, not to mention if the twig ever gets hit, better have a helicopter nearby. </p>
<p>Kris Jenkins is definitely better than any option the Jets would have had in the 3rd round this year, so that was an excellent move by the Jets. Nobody expects Ainge to pan out more than a backup and if he does then the Jets lucked out, dont forget his weapons were pretty bad down in Tenn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmlongo</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81096</link>
		<dc:creator>gmlongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81096</guid>
		<description>I hope we didn&#039;t make a mistake by passing on Woodson and taking Ainge.  From everything I have seen, Woodson was a much more successful QB and has great arm strength, size, and decent mobility.  I hope I&#039;m wrong, but I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we didn&#8217;t make a mistake by passing on Woodson and taking Ainge.  From everything I have seen, Woodson was a much more successful QB and has great arm strength, size, and decent mobility.  I hope I&#8217;m wrong, but I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSmizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81071</link>
		<dc:creator>DSmizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81071</guid>
		<description>llan, why should we &quot;calm&quot; talks about what is clearly two top-heavy drafts the past two years?

I am not complaining about it, as I think if you could get 2 very good-to-great starters from each year&#039;s draft, you are in very good shape.  Granted, you can&#039;t do it forever b/c you need to be able to draft depth for backup positions, some special teamers in the middle rounds like Leon Washington, etc., but if you are going to go top-heavy, last year&#039;s draft is a perfect model of how to do so.

In addition, Kris Jenkins was their 3rd round pick this year... not too shabby IMHO.  Gholston, Keller and Kris Jenkins is a very good draft haul IMHO, on top of last year&#039;s top-heavy, but effective draft.

llan, &quot;top-heavy&quot; is a descriptive term, not an opinion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>llan, why should we &#8220;calm&#8221; talks about what is clearly two top-heavy drafts the past two years?</p>
<p>I am not complaining about it, as I think if you could get 2 very good-to-great starters from each year&#8217;s draft, you are in very good shape.  Granted, you can&#8217;t do it forever b/c you need to be able to draft depth for backup positions, some special teamers in the middle rounds like Leon Washington, etc., but if you are going to go top-heavy, last year&#8217;s draft is a perfect model of how to do so.</p>
<p>In addition, Kris Jenkins was their 3rd round pick this year&#8230; not too shabby IMHO.  Gholston, Keller and Kris Jenkins is a very good draft haul IMHO, on top of last year&#8217;s top-heavy, but effective draft.</p>
<p>llan, &#8220;top-heavy&#8221; is a descriptive term, not an opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81069</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81069</guid>
		<description>I think we should calm the talk about having top-heavy drafts. Yes, the Jets had only two 1-3 round picks in the last two drafts but the hope is that these guys will all become staples on this team for the next 5 years if not longer. The other thing to recognize is that with the upside to the Vilma and Robertson trades the Jets could have 4 picks in the first two rounds next year. With the massive money spent on free agents and the $20 million they will have to guarantee Gholston, I imagine the FO thought it prudent to restrict the number of draft picks this year while looking towards the potential haul next year. With the conditional pick for Kendall factored in the Jets have 9-10 draft picks to use in &#039;09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should calm the talk about having top-heavy drafts. Yes, the Jets had only two 1-3 round picks in the last two drafts but the hope is that these guys will all become staples on this team for the next 5 years if not longer. The other thing to recognize is that with the upside to the Vilma and Robertson trades the Jets could have 4 picks in the first two rounds next year. With the massive money spent on free agents and the $20 million they will have to guarantee Gholston, I imagine the FO thought it prudent to restrict the number of draft picks this year while looking towards the potential haul next year. With the conditional pick for Kendall factored in the Jets have 9-10 draft picks to use in &#8217;09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSmizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81066</link>
		<dc:creator>DSmizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81066</guid>
		<description>Ainge sucks, but I think the JETS had a second draft in a row that was VERY top-heavy, but that will go down as a success if Gholston and Keller are useful and/or very good players... this is what they got out of last year&#039;s draft:  2 very good, perhaps great, starters... and a couple of turd burglars.

I&#039;ll take it.  You also kinda gotta consider Kris Jenkins as a starter that came from this draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ainge sucks, but I think the JETS had a second draft in a row that was VERY top-heavy, but that will go down as a success if Gholston and Keller are useful and/or very good players&#8230; this is what they got out of last year&#8217;s draft:  2 very good, perhaps great, starters&#8230; and a couple of turd burglars.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take it.  You also kinda gotta consider Kris Jenkins as a starter that came from this draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Styne</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/04/28/erik-ainge-couldnt-be-happier-about-the-jets/#comment-81058</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Styne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=4097#comment-81058</guid>
		<description>Ainge&#039;s arm looks more injured than Pennington&#039;s and it&#039;s not even injured. He must be a Rhodes Scholar Finalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ainge&#8217;s arm looks more injured than Pennington&#8217;s and it&#8217;s not even injured. He must be a Rhodes Scholar Finalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/324 objects using memcached

Served from: www.thejetsblog.com @ 2012-02-12 12:31:01 -->
