<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Conflicting) News: The First Cuts are the Deepest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:57:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98108</guid>
		<description>I thought he looked good too, but overall is 3.2 yards per carry that impressive against a bunch of second and third stringers?

If the Jets can get value for their number three RB (which they didn&#039;t use AT ALL last year), then it might not be a bad move to pull the trigger.  (Although, it doesn&#039;t seem certain that it will even happen).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought he looked good too, but overall is 3.2 yards per carry that impressive against a bunch of second and third stringers?</p>
<p>If the Jets can get value for their number three RB (which they didn&#8217;t use AT ALL last year), then it might not be a bad move to pull the trigger.  (Although, it doesn&#8217;t seem certain that it will even happen).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98106</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98106</guid>
		<description>That would be pretty stupid trading Jesse Chatman, did they not see how he performed? Or were we all just witnessing one of TV&#039;s illusions? I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be pretty stupid trading Jesse Chatman, did they not see how he performed? Or were we all just witnessing one of TV&#8217;s illusions? I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyckage</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98095</link>
		<dc:creator>nyckage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98095</guid>
		<description>why is poteat gone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is poteat gone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98086</guid>
		<description>Harlan...was that sarcasm or did you get Chatham (LB) and Chatman (RB) mixed up?  I thought you wanted Chatham (LB) out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan&#8230;was that sarcasm or did you get Chatham (LB) and Chatman (RB) mixed up?  I thought you wanted Chatham (LB) out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98076</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98076</guid>
		<description>Here is link that agent refutes both cut and trade:

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&amp;id=632&amp;line=121224&amp;spln=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is link that agent refutes both cut and trade:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&amp;id=632&amp;line=121224&amp;spln=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&amp;id=632&amp;line=121224&amp;spln=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed(itor)</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98075</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed(itor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98075</guid>
		<description>1050 espn radio. It would make a lot of sense. He was clearly, in my opinion, beaten out for #2 by Ratliff, they get a pick or picks for him and they get to keep Ainge. Seems like a win-win. Let&#039;s hope it is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1050 espn radio. It would make a lot of sense. He was clearly, in my opinion, beaten out for #2 by Ratliff, they get a pick or picks for him and they get to keep Ainge. Seems like a win-win. Let&#8217;s hope it is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swizzle81</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98074</link>
		<dc:creator>swizzle81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98074</guid>
		<description>Where did you hear the rumor, That would be awesome, KC contract is up at the end of the year if i am not mistaken. Anything we could get for him would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you hear the rumor, That would be awesome, KC contract is up at the end of the year if i am not mistaken. Anything we could get for him would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed(itor)</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98072</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed(itor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98072</guid>
		<description>Rumor that Clemens has been traded to vikings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumor that Clemens has been traded to vikings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlan Lachman</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/comment-page-1/#comment-98062</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlan Lachman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/08/30/conflicting-news-the-first-cuts-are-the-deepest/#comment-98062</guid>
		<description>IT would be great if Hutch was wrong. About Chatham. I hope the others are cut.

OTOH, although I would fear not having a reliable back up to TJ (in whom I have serious doubts) and Leon, I think extra picks in next year&#039;s drafts in the 4th round or better might be instrumental, especially in light of the Favre trade where we likely lose at a two or a three. 

If Ratliff ain&#039;t the guy (and it would be a Brady like surprise if he was) then we need to get a top QB. Extra picks next year will be more important than a back up.

harlan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT would be great if Hutch was wrong. About Chatham. I hope the others are cut.</p>
<p>OTOH, although I would fear not having a reliable back up to TJ (in whom I have serious doubts) and Leon, I think extra picks in next year&#8217;s drafts in the 4th round or better might be instrumental, especially in light of the Favre trade where we likely lose at a two or a three. </p>
<p>If Ratliff ain&#8217;t the guy (and it would be a Brady like surprise if he was) then we need to get a top QB. Extra picks next year will be more important than a back up.</p>
<p>harlan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
