<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Links: Eight Months in the Making</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/09/07/daily-links-eight-months-in-the-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/09/07/daily-links-eight-months-in-the-making/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:49:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ramble914</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/09/07/daily-links-eight-months-in-the-making/comment-page-1/#comment-99131</link>
		<dc:creator>ramble914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=5543#comment-99131</guid>
		<description>Bassett,

When I read your intro to Mike Vaccarro&#039;s article, I thought there might be some juicy story between you and him for the statement &quot;Mike Vaccarro projects his emotional shortcomings onto Chad Pennington&quot;. But, after reading it, I realized there didn&#039;t have to be some underlining reason for the statement other then he really does project his emotional short comings.

Any person who would spend time and energy calling a former employer every year to curse him out because of a firing is not very well balanced. 

Unless of course I&#039;m all wrong and there is some juicy story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bassett,</p>
<p>When I read your intro to Mike Vaccarro&#8217;s article, I thought there might be some juicy story between you and him for the statement &#8220;Mike Vaccarro projects his emotional shortcomings onto Chad Pennington&#8221;. But, after reading it, I realized there didn&#8217;t have to be some underlining reason for the statement other then he really does project his emotional short comings.</p>
<p>Any person who would spend time and energy calling a former employer every year to curse him out because of a firing is not very well balanced. </p>
<p>Unless of course I&#8217;m all wrong and there is some juicy story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
