<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stats: Halfway Through 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:56:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kc.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108265</link>
		<dc:creator>kc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108265</guid>
		<description>If we didnt have those &quot;GLARING&quot; problems we COULD be 7-1!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we didnt have those &#8220;GLARING&#8221; problems we COULD be 7-1!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat d</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108253</link>
		<dc:creator>pat d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108253</guid>
		<description>I agree, glaring. If you want to be a contender we need to improve the pass defense and the kicking game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, glaring. If you want to be a contender we need to improve the pass defense and the kicking game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108250</link>
		<dc:creator>kc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108250</guid>
		<description>yes,GLARING</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes,GLARING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvv</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108236</link>
		<dc:creator>billvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108236</guid>
		<description>At five and three, you can&#039;t call them glaring.  Things we can work on, yes.  GLARING problems?  As I blame my father says (now that&#039;s a problem for another site entirely!)  stuffing the run leads to more passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At five and three, you can&#8217;t call them glaring.  Things we can work on, yes.  GLARING problems?  As I blame my father says (now that&#8217;s a problem for another site entirely!)  stuffing the run leads to more passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108188</link>
		<dc:creator>kc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108188</guid>
		<description>FIELD GOALS and PASS DEFENSE are GLARING problems......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIELD GOALS and PASS DEFENSE are GLARING problems&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I blame my father...</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108177</link>
		<dc:creator>I blame my father...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108177</guid>
		<description>The stats make sense.  We throw more picks than anyone, thus our defense is on the field more  - defending a shorter field.  We stuff the run so teams go to the air.  Of course, more pass plays leads to more sacks.  But since you can&#039;t get a sack every play we do give up pass yardage - but not a huge amount of points.  (We&#039;ve also played a lot of bad teams). 

The good news is our secondary is pretty sound against the big play - deep ball.  It&#039;s the short underneath stuff; tight ends; backs coming out of the backfield that kill us - especially on 3rd down.

Saw a lot of good stuff (and some not so great stuff) this Sunday.  For the first time in a long time, I have to say, I feel like we &quot;out-coached&quot; the other team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stats make sense.  We throw more picks than anyone, thus our defense is on the field more  &#8211; defending a shorter field.  We stuff the run so teams go to the air.  Of course, more pass plays leads to more sacks.  But since you can&#8217;t get a sack every play we do give up pass yardage &#8211; but not a huge amount of points.  (We&#8217;ve also played a lot of bad teams). </p>
<p>The good news is our secondary is pretty sound against the big play &#8211; deep ball.  It&#8217;s the short underneath stuff; tight ends; backs coming out of the backfield that kill us &#8211; especially on 3rd down.</p>
<p>Saw a lot of good stuff (and some not so great stuff) this Sunday.  For the first time in a long time, I have to say, I feel like we &#8220;out-coached&#8221; the other team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete57</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108162</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108162</guid>
		<description>The numbers would suggest our offense is very efficient: Overall ranking 17th, but we are 8th in points.

At first glance the defense seems not to be as efficient. Overall rank 13th, but 19th in points allowed. I will give them a little break because we lead the league in interceptions which obviously puts more pressure on the defense.

It goes without saying our kicking game has been a weak spot thus far. Although I do like the punter and hopefully we get Nuge back soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers would suggest our offense is very efficient: Overall ranking 17th, but we are 8th in points.</p>
<p>At first glance the defense seems not to be as efficient. Overall rank 13th, but 19th in points allowed. I will give them a little break because we lead the league in interceptions which obviously puts more pressure on the defense.</p>
<p>It goes without saying our kicking game has been a weak spot thus far. Although I do like the punter and hopefully we get Nuge back soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charleyjet</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108157</link>
		<dc:creator>charleyjet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108157</guid>
		<description>If the Jets O-line is 4th rated in run blocking (see earlier post) and they are only 15th in rushing, that means they aren&#039;t calling for the run enough. With the cold winds coming its time to get smash mouth, like they did in that last drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Jets O-line is 4th rated in run blocking (see earlier post) and they are only 15th in rushing, that means they aren&#8217;t calling for the run enough. With the cold winds coming its time to get smash mouth, like they did in that last drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvv</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108156</link>
		<dc:creator>billvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108156</guid>
		<description>Currently placing the Jets at the bottom of the top half of teams is a reasonable place to be.  The next two games should tell us if that should be higher, lower, or about right.  The Goldielocks games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently placing the Jets at the bottom of the top half of teams is a reasonable place to be.  The next two games should tell us if that should be higher, lower, or about right.  The Goldielocks games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klecko71</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-108147</link>
		<dc:creator>klecko71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2008/11/03/stats-halfway-through-2008/#comment-108147</guid>
		<description>for a team thats 2nd in sacks and 4th against the run.... its surprising that we are in the middle of the pack overall. 

something tells me if we had a more aggressive defensive philosophy, we would be 7 and 1...

not that defense cost us the raider game!!  but a team thats 2nd in sacks and 4th against the run, and remember we arent 4th against the run b/c we have been ahead by tons of pts so the other team has to pass!!!.... we somehow arent a &quot;dominant defense&quot;...

hmmm.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for a team thats 2nd in sacks and 4th against the run&#8230;. its surprising that we are in the middle of the pack overall. </p>
<p>something tells me if we had a more aggressive defensive philosophy, we would be 7 and 1&#8230;</p>
<p>not that defense cost us the raider game!!  but a team thats 2nd in sacks and 4th against the run, and remember we arent 4th against the run b/c we have been ahead by tons of pts so the other team has to pass!!!&#8230;. we somehow arent a &#8220;dominant defense&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>hmmm&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
