Comments on: ABMD Update, We’re On Deck!!

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:30:15 +0000

JD because the Jets need the Tallest WR. someone to make most QB’s look better than what they are.
Randy Moss made Chad Pennington look great in College. he is 6 6. he can catch passes most defenders can not touch.

By: Testaverde

Testaverde — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:47:07 +0000

Take Freeman… And if possible trade him and 3rd to Mcdaniels for Cutler

By: ABMD: With the 17th Pick … | JetsVine

ABMD: With the 17th Pick … | JetsVine — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:18:42 +0000

[...] to the many of you who voiced your opinion on who the Jets should take. Since the commenters were fairly evenly split, we went with the steak of the Draft, as opposed to the sizzle. [...]

By: ABMD Update, We’re On Deck!! | JetsVine

ABMD Update, We’re On Deck!! | JetsVine — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:18:25 +0000

[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]

By: Greenisgood

Greenisgood — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:20:42 +0000

DRAFT SANCHEZ THEN TRADE HIM STRAIGHT UP FOR CUTLER!!!

By: RK

RK — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:07:45 +0000

I would never say that. Cutler is a waste to me and will destroy the cohesion on the Jets.

Sackdance, the height difference between Wells and Moreno is 2″ according to ESPN but the weight difference is 30lbs. Since they move the same I’d take Wells because he gets more momentum and he looks like he handles hits better. Don’t go judging people out of hand if you just don’t like Wells. If you watch Wells at all you see that he moves just like Moreno but stiff arms better and leaves himself less vulnerable to big hits during impact.

By: RK

RK — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:53:24 +0000

ignore the pick. do anything they can to get cutler. end of story.

By: JesusRevis

JesusRevis — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:33:38 +0000

JL, i’m not a Sanchez fan, so my comment about him being the best value at 17 is simply based on draft projections. Sanchez is usually projected to go in the top 10, and therefore I said he would be the best value at 17. I dont want him though.

By: SackDance99

SackDance99 — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:00:44 +0000

Wait until Harvin’s pro day. Lots of scouts thought the 40 equipment malfunctioned during the Combine. If Harvin runs in the low 4.3 range, or better, then the difference between Harvin and DHB is almost 2″ (a plus for DHB) and talent (Harvin was arguably the most exciting player in Div. 1). The thought that Harvin can’t get deep and stretch the field just strikes me as way off base. Plus, there is NO WR in the draft who runs better after the catch. As for the Moreno v. Wells debate, big guys like Wells, who run straight up, take tons of punishment. The elusive guys like Emmit, Curtis or Barry have long careers.

Harvlis, I’ve been pounding the table for weeks on Freeman. If Freeman were playing any other position, with his superior measurables, he’d be the talk of the draft. Remember when Matt Jones got drafted as a WR in the 1st round just because he was tall, fast, and a good athlete? Freeman is nearly 6-6, has a cannon arm, scored 14 rushing TDs last season, has great mobility and can throw long and accurate, with zip, on the run. I know QB involves way more factors and Freeman has the rap of being inconsistent, but to paraphrase the Parcells Planet Theory, there just isn’t that many guys on this planet who are 6-6, mobile, and can throw a football 60 yards on a frozen rope. He’s a project, but if he succeeds…WOW!

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:21:46 +0000

Look at Chad Jackson’s measurables. They’re not too far off DHB’s. Then look at his production in college. Then look at his production in the NFL.