<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jets 2009 Draft Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA...Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150574</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA...Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150574</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add that we would be getting the ravens 5th giving us a the 5th we lost from the Lito trade....

Thanks iggy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add that we would be getting the ravens 5th giving us a the 5th we lost from the Lito trade&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks iggy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggy McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150571</link>
		<dc:creator>Iggy McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150571</guid>
		<description>Drew-here&#039;s the problem with your proposed trade:  It screws the Jets.  Our 17 is worth 950 points.  26th is owned by the Ravens and has a value of 700.  Their #3 (88) is worth 150, leaving the deal 100 points shy of parity.  Add in their 4 &amp; 5 (77 pts) and we&#039;re getting closer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew-here&#8217;s the problem with your proposed trade:  It screws the Jets.  Our 17 is worth 950 points.  26th is owned by the Ravens and has a value of 700.  Their #3 (88) is worth 150, leaving the deal 100 points shy of parity.  Add in their 4 &amp; 5 (77 pts) and we&#8217;re getting closer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozzie</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150570</link>
		<dc:creator>bozzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150570</guid>
		<description>I assume WR Percy Harvin will fall due to him testing positive for the green leafy substance at the NFL combine...maybe Harvin and Ellis can roll a fatty together?  Geez, how dumb can you be? That&#039;s going to cost him a few coins in his pocket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume WR Percy Harvin will fall due to him testing positive for the green leafy substance at the NFL combine&#8230;maybe Harvin and Ellis can roll a fatty together?  Geez, how dumb can you be? That&#8217;s going to cost him a few coins in his pocket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA...Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150555</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA...Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150555</guid>
		<description>Heres my prediction..... since the draft challenge was brought up:

Jets trade back from #17 to lets say #26 picking up an additional 3rd rounder

At #26 we draft Kenny Britt

We then (and I hate if this happens but I think they love Freeman) we trade back into the bottom of the 1st or top of the second givng up that additional 3rd to draft Josh Freeman. If Tampa doestn take him @ 19 he will fall.

Meaning we have Britt, Freeman and #76 still left. We then go RB, DL/OL, TE

Mr T loves to trade up and has done so alot in his first 3 drafts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres my prediction&#8230;.. since the draft challenge was brought up:</p>
<p>Jets trade back from #17 to lets say #26 picking up an additional 3rd rounder</p>
<p>At #26 we draft Kenny Britt</p>
<p>We then (and I hate if this happens but I think they love Freeman) we trade back into the bottom of the 1st or top of the second givng up that additional 3rd to draft Josh Freeman. If Tampa doestn take him @ 19 he will fall.</p>
<p>Meaning we have Britt, Freeman and #76 still left. We then go RB, DL/OL, TE</p>
<p>Mr T loves to trade up and has done so alot in his first 3 drafts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCJETSFAN</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150552</link>
		<dc:creator>DCJETSFAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150552</guid>
		<description>I think the Jets have a 4th round pick -- received from Washington for Kendall.  Jets traded Kendall for a 5th round pick, which escalated to a 4th round pick if Kendall played in 80% of the offensive snaps -- which he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Jets have a 4th round pick &#8212; received from Washington for Kendall.  Jets traded Kendall for a 5th round pick, which escalated to a 4th round pick if Kendall played in 80% of the offensive snaps &#8212; which he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150551</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150551</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mole57</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150550</link>
		<dc:creator>mole57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150550</guid>
		<description>Will there be a Draft challenge this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will there be a Draft challenge this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150549</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150549</guid>
		<description>Vilma was only worth a #76!! terrible trade by Mike T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vilma was only worth a #76!! terrible trade by Mike T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOZ THE JET</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150548</link>
		<dc:creator>HOZ THE JET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/04/22/jets-2009-draft-picks/#comment-150548</guid>
		<description>i hate to say this but we need to trade that 17th pick and pick up some extra one&#039;s we have a lot of needs and only have 6 picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate to say this but we need to trade that 17th pick and pick up some extra one&#8217;s we have a lot of needs and only have 6 picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 312/313 objects using memcached

Served from: www.thejetsblog.com @ 2012-02-12 03:47:52 -->
