Comments on: Link: A TJ Replacement?

By: GoalieTJ1

GoalieTJ1 — Mon, 18 May 2009 09:33:25 +0000

Leon is a must if we bring any other RB to the table besides TJ;
Even though i do not want any other RB to sign besides Leon, If we do sign just TJ and Shonn i think we could get by.
Best case scenario is TJ & Leon both sign; Shonn signs on time and our offense goes to work as human battering rams.
Bottom line is 2/3 must sign and report to camp on time……

By: Mrjetgreen

Mrjetgreen — Sun, 17 May 2009 17:28:24 +0000

Golly gee whize……..who do I want………Duce McAllister or Kevin Barlow……….maybe Derrick Blayloc is available……..sweet desperation.

By: SackDance99

SackDance99 — Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:46 +0000

cbiscuit, you’re right, I should have said for salary reasons LJ will be cut because he’s due a lot of money this season. KC might not want to pay such big $$ to guy that isn’t in their long-term plans.

By: Harvlis

Harvlis — Sun, 17 May 2009 03:53:42 +0000

I wish everybody would stop trying to get rid of TJ. Tanny needs to work things out and get TJ back on course. Our offense has enough question marks, without wondering who will be our starting back.

By: cbiscuit

cbiscuit — Sun, 17 May 2009 02:31:20 +0000

I like LJ as well, but if they cut him it will be due to Pioli & co.’s intolerance of the off-the-field stuff, not cap space. KC is something like $30M under.

By: SackDance99

SackDance99 — Sat, 16 May 2009 22:48:12 +0000

My replacement idea is Larry Johnson. There’s every indication that KC will cut him for cap reasons soon. He showed flashes of his old form last year and might still have a couple of peak seasons left. He had a 4.5 YPC with KC’s bad OL and he lit up the Fins last year. If he’s healthy, he a quality big back.

By: Fish Hunters

Fish Hunters — Sat, 16 May 2009 22:40:58 +0000

I like it. Take a wait and see if Greene can handle the load, I have every confidence he can. Then trade TJ for a 2nd or 3rd. Forget the receiver cause we won’t have the cap room after having to pay Leon and pay Sanchez. Use Deuce to spell Greene. Great! We need to start getting something in return for our players. Not just releasing them.

By: LWSquad

LWSquad — Sat, 16 May 2009 19:19:22 +0000

I like this post. I think it makes a great story. We get to start Greene (Rookie with little tread on tires and great decision making with BURST), Pay LW (Flat-out the best off. Playmaker in the AFC), and Drop The Deuce on Third-and-2-1-Goal! (Aging vet looking for the ring). Plus we’ve got a Wildcard with Second-year man Woodhead (He gives Good Uhhhh YAC). If we can negotiate anything in the way of either a WR or OLB/DE for Jones, we should do it! I’d prefer a Def. trade. I still believe Marvelous Marvin is still the sticky-fingered Vet we need. We keep hearing about our “group of young, talented recievers” so please tell me who would be a better teacher than a SUPER-BOWL ALL-PRO Football Catching Machine? Seriously, for years I thought he was a robot invented by the NFL to make Peyton a great QB. Prove me wrong.

By: Le'Sean Roberts

Le'Sean Roberts — Sat, 16 May 2009 18:26:08 +0000

Edge has more versatility than Duece. Also Edge should have never got away from the zone blocking he had with the colts..Edge could really make people miss in small spaces. The Jets incorporate zone blocking at times; Edge is overall better with catching, blocking, etc. Arizona brought the Pitt offensive philosophy in terms of running the ball, but their offensive line wasn’t built to do that.

By: kenobrien

kenobrien — Sat, 16 May 2009 17:17:07 +0000

this is silly. jonesy’ll play in green and white.