Comments on: Link: Fantasy Writer Gets Flacco-Ryan vs. Sanchez-Stafford Argument All Wrong

By: Kevino

Kevino — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:43:56 +0000

lol… ok, terrific!

By: Le'Sean Roberts

Le'Sean Roberts — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:17:05 +0000

Kevino, the fact is you don’t have mental hierarchy to understand this. Stock in a fantasy world… over some baseless argument. The fact is considering Sanchez in Fantasy Football is idiotic no matter what angle you try to come with. Reading is fundamental, sure…it’s just that you don’t know how to decipher excrement from intelligence. You confuse the two. That’s just the majority of people like you. You show up and people give you the benefit of the doubt because of “certain things”, then you all @#$5 up.

By: Kevino

Kevino — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:39:47 +0000

Le’Sean…

You’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? If you bothered to read the article, it would be easy to see that it is written from a fantasy football perspective. I’m not getting into anything. I don’t think your inability to read is a determining factor in how good of a Jets fan I am. The lesson as always:

R.I.F

Reading Is Fundamental

By: Le'Sean Roberts

Le'Sean Roberts — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:17:35 +0000

Kevino, at this of stage of their careers you’re getting into fantasy football. Dude I’m thinking about stability and getting to the big one, ever since we flopped to Denver. Fantasy football at this stage? You don’t sound like a good JETS fan at all. We don’t even have a proven talent like Roddy White yet. Like it or not Cotchery isn’t going to do that. Our divsion’s run DEF will be one of the best, so don’t expect Turner performances.

By: Angel Navedo

Angel Navedo — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:33:01 +0000

StvDoe,

I tried looking at it from a fantasy perspective, but still couldn’t find the merit in Schwarz’ argument. I almost overlooked the article like Bent did, but the writer only addresses fantasy projections in his conclusion. Initially, it reads like an attempt at real analysis.

I don’t know much about fantasy football, but like you said — Flacco and Ryan were both average fantasy players.

-Angel

By: Link: Fantasy Writer Gets Flacco-Ryan vs. Sanchez-Stafford Argument All Wrong | JetsVine

Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:21:54 +0000

[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]

By: EastSide

EastSide — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:27:28 +0000

All Joe Flacco had to do last year was something Kyle Boller never figured out- emulate Trent Dilfer.

By: Kevino

Kevino — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:15:56 +0000

StvDoe is right on the money… That article was strictly about fantasy football. It has nothing to do with what the Jets might or might not do on the field this year…

By: Zartan

Zartan — Sun, 31 May 2009 21:31:22 +0000

i think each and every player mentioned will have great careers. going on feeling and personal perspective, i think Sanchez and Stafford have that will win a superbowl moxy(whether they do it or not)

Matt Ryan: dont think he”s that great and might never exceed rookie season although it was great.

Flacco: wasnt really ready not sure how much he has but he has the prttiest deep ball in the league right now.

Sanchez: seems to have it all slightly below Payton Manning,we’ll see.

Stafford will help detroit win some games this year and get them in the post season and soon.

By: Le'Sean Roberts

Le'Sean Roberts — Sun, 31 May 2009 21:12:07 +0000

Until they play, their arguments have no ground…like sand on a windy beach; “some get blown away”, “while others are taken by the tide”. No one can hold their ground with no proof (foundation) Then again, for Culpepper to get beat out by Stafford, that would be embarrassing, and might the end for him. People must understand that Sanchez is an investment; not some commando you send to take some god forsaken rock, knowing he might not coming back.