<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link: Solidifying the Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:13:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Link: Solidifying the Line &#124; JetsVine</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161404</link>
		<dc:creator>Link: Solidifying the Line &#124; JetsVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161404</guid>
		<description>[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvlis</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161341</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvlis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161341</guid>
		<description>I think D&#039;Brick does a very good job, at his position.   I have said this before but, many of the sacks that Favre took were as a result of the formations and play calls.  This season, we are supposed to be going back to the motion offense that we employed in 2006.  That should keep defenses off balance and give D&#039;Brick the advantage he needs, in order to hold his man.  OC&#039;s have to pay attention to great pass rushers and plan their games around them.  That would include having the FB and the TE help out on certain plays.  Hence, the reason we could use a solid blocking TE.  I believe that any TE you use should have the ability to catch the ball, as you always want to maximize your offensive options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think D&#8217;Brick does a very good job, at his position.   I have said this before but, many of the sacks that Favre took were as a result of the formations and play calls.  This season, we are supposed to be going back to the motion offense that we employed in 2006.  That should keep defenses off balance and give D&#8217;Brick the advantage he needs, in order to hold his man.  OC&#8217;s have to pay attention to great pass rushers and plan their games around them.  That would include having the FB and the TE help out on certain plays.  Hence, the reason we could use a solid blocking TE.  I believe that any TE you use should have the ability to catch the ball, as you always want to maximize your offensive options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161325</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161325</guid>
		<description>hank/naples-

Bassett used the term &quot;in-line blocker&quot; which usually connotes a run blocker because a pass blocker steps back from the line of scrimmage.  The second sentence about Brown and Milner seemed to build on the initial sentence to say that they are unknown quantities as &quot;in-line blockers&quot; and then he used the conjunction &quot;and&quot; to make an additional point about helping Brick with the pass rush.  At least, that&#039;s how I interpreted Bassett&#039;s point (so, Ian, I actually didn&#039;t skim Bassett&#039;s post).  I do not think that he was limiting his comments to pass blocking because, as Ian points out, the TE usually goes out for a pass on passing downs and, the Jets during Schott&#039;s tenure have used the TE as a pass catcher almost more than any other team in the NFL.

DSmizzle,

I respectfully disagree.  Great pass-catching TEs are rarely good run-blockers and there have been many great rushing teams that used the TE primarily as a pass catcher.  An extra blocker is nice, but that can adversely affect the passing game.  The Jets have a great FB lead blocker.  IMO, the only reason the Jets would need a run blocking TE is in short yardage to spread the defense out.  Keller is such a weapon as a pass catcher that the OLB will usually cover him and the DE will chuck him.  That occupies 2 defensive players without Keller trying to block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hank/naples-</p>
<p>Bassett used the term &#8220;in-line blocker&#8221; which usually connotes a run blocker because a pass blocker steps back from the line of scrimmage.  The second sentence about Brown and Milner seemed to build on the initial sentence to say that they are unknown quantities as &#8220;in-line blockers&#8221; and then he used the conjunction &#8220;and&#8221; to make an additional point about helping Brick with the pass rush.  At least, that&#8217;s how I interpreted Bassett&#8217;s point (so, Ian, I actually didn&#8217;t skim Bassett&#8217;s post).  I do not think that he was limiting his comments to pass blocking because, as Ian points out, the TE usually goes out for a pass on passing downs and, the Jets during Schott&#8217;s tenure have used the TE as a pass catcher almost more than any other team in the NFL.</p>
<p>DSmizzle,</p>
<p>I respectfully disagree.  Great pass-catching TEs are rarely good run-blockers and there have been many great rushing teams that used the TE primarily as a pass catcher.  An extra blocker is nice, but that can adversely affect the passing game.  The Jets have a great FB lead blocker.  IMO, the only reason the Jets would need a run blocking TE is in short yardage to spread the defense out.  Keller is such a weapon as a pass catcher that the OLB will usually cover him and the DE will chuck him.  That occupies 2 defensive players without Keller trying to block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Shnoogen</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Shnoogen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161312</guid>
		<description>His name is Tim Graham, as I&#039;m sure you know very well... little typo tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His name is Tim Graham, as I&#8217;m sure you know very well&#8230; little typo tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161308</guid>
		<description>Ferguson is over-rated and gets beat way too often... if Rex Ryan doesn&#039;t light a fire under his butt we will need to keep a blocking TE or back in to give him help on the left side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferguson is over-rated and gets beat way too often&#8230; if Rex Ryan doesn&#8217;t light a fire under his butt we will need to keep a blocking TE or back in to give him help on the left side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSmizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161306</link>
		<dc:creator>DSmizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161306</guid>
		<description>SD99:

I have to disagree on the issue of blocking TE&#039;s.

Yes, its not an absolute necessity for a great running game to have a good blocking TE, but its also not a necessity for a great running game to have a great LT or RT.

A great blocking TE is a plus for a running game, period.  Even if you can get by without one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SD99:</p>
<p>I have to disagree on the issue of blocking TE&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Yes, its not an absolute necessity for a great running game to have a good blocking TE, but its also not a necessity for a great running game to have a great LT or RT.</p>
<p>A great blocking TE is a plus for a running game, period.  Even if you can get by without one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlan Lachman</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161305</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlan Lachman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161305</guid>
		<description>Brad&#039;s points are well taken. New QB and non all pro WR and a strong running O should tend to scare most fans excited by passing.

OTOH, the Ravens, realizing this last year, threw a lot of long passes and not just on 3rd down. The idea was as long as they were not going to pass their way consistently down the field, and with a Good D able to to deal with not so great field position, why not be more audacious and throw it up for grabs.

Ryan saw how far a rookie Qb went with that approach.

I expect to see a lot more long tosses this year, regardless of the Qb, especially if the D holds up as many of us hope.

harlan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad&#8217;s points are well taken. New QB and non all pro WR and a strong running O should tend to scare most fans excited by passing.</p>
<p>OTOH, the Ravens, realizing this last year, threw a lot of long passes and not just on 3rd down. The idea was as long as they were not going to pass their way consistently down the field, and with a Good D able to to deal with not so great field position, why not be more audacious and throw it up for grabs.</p>
<p>Ryan saw how far a rookie Qb went with that approach.</p>
<p>I expect to see a lot more long tosses this year, regardless of the Qb, especially if the D holds up as many of us hope.</p>
<p>harlan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161298</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161298</guid>
		<description>i agree with bubby/shovel pass: d&#039;brick will do better against freeny and speed rushers than against stronger DE&#039;s like schobel and seymour, and perhaps mario williams.

also: sackdance seems to have skimmed, rather than read basset&#039;s post.  with that said, i&#039;m not sure how much a TE helps in pass protection either.  how often does TE stay in?  i think the RB/FB is more important in pass protection than TE.  presumably, that is one area where TJ would be much better than green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with bubby/shovel pass: d&#8217;brick will do better against freeny and speed rushers than against stronger DE&#8217;s like schobel and seymour, and perhaps mario williams.</p>
<p>also: sackdance seems to have skimmed, rather than read basset&#8217;s post.  with that said, i&#8217;m not sure how much a TE helps in pass protection either.  how often does TE stay in?  i think the RB/FB is more important in pass protection than TE.  presumably, that is one area where TJ would be much better than green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank/naples</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161294</link>
		<dc:creator>hank/naples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161294</guid>
		<description>SD99:

Interesting comment and unless you&#039;re having a separate conv. w/Bassett, I fail to see where he says there is a correlation for a good running game between a TE and RB. Bassett&#039;s comments were between a QB and a TE on sacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SD99:</p>
<p>Interesting comment and unless you&#8217;re having a separate conv. w/Bassett, I fail to see where he says there is a correlation for a good running game between a TE and RB. Bassett&#8217;s comments were between a QB and a TE on sacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramble914</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-161293</link>
		<dc:creator>ramble914</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/09/link-solidifying-the-line/#comment-161293</guid>
		<description>The Ed,

I don&#039;t think its a case of the Jets worrying about the fans getting wet, as much as it is about not being able to fit them (the fans) into the indoor practice facility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ed,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think its a case of the Jets worrying about the fans getting wet, as much as it is about not being able to fit them (the fans) into the indoor practice facility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
