<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Room: JeeHuuuuuuuu!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: igs</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163307</link>
		<dc:creator>igs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163307</guid>
		<description>Ha, Jehuu Caulrick, yet another reason that we didn&#039;t have to throw so many picks at Shonne Green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, Jehuu Caulrick, yet another reason that we didn&#8217;t have to throw so many picks at Shonne Green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miketaliaferro</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163282</link>
		<dc:creator>miketaliaferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163282</guid>
		<description>Fonz,

Just to clarify, Lowery was a low draft pick, but Jehuu was an UDFA and sat on the practice squad last year.

I love this clip vs. ND, though. What a moose, running through college guys. It&#039;s a bit harder when NFL guys are closer to your size. But, still great power. I think he&#039;s ahead of Woodhead (heading to practice squad?) since he can spell Tony R. to give Tony a breather and extend his career all that much more, then be ready to step in when Tony retires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fonz,</p>
<p>Just to clarify, Lowery was a low draft pick, but Jehuu was an UDFA and sat on the practice squad last year.</p>
<p>I love this clip vs. ND, though. What a moose, running through college guys. It&#8217;s a bit harder when NFL guys are closer to your size. But, still great power. I think he&#8217;s ahead of Woodhead (heading to practice squad?) since he can spell Tony R. to give Tony a breather and extend his career all that much more, then be ready to step in when Tony retires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163245</guid>
		<description>RKNYC - Jehuu ran a 4.41 in highschool, when he was probably 200 pounds.  Since he bulked up to 255, his speed has reduced, as you would expect and he ran 4.70 at the combine, which is pretty good for a guy that size.

NFL.com isn&#039;t flawless, anyway.  Last year, their combine coverage had two DBs listed as 6&#039;9&quot; and also a defensive tackle ran a 3.80 forty!

I hope to see him in action soon too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RKNYC &#8211; Jehuu ran a 4.41 in highschool, when he was probably 200 pounds.  Since he bulked up to 255, his speed has reduced, as you would expect and he ran 4.70 at the combine, which is pretty good for a guy that size.</p>
<p>NFL.com isn&#8217;t flawless, anyway.  Last year, their combine coverage had two DBs listed as 6&#8217;9&#8243; and also a defensive tackle ran a 3.80 forty!</p>
<p>I hope to see him in action soon too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FernandoQ</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163241</link>
		<dc:creator>FernandoQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163241</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to seeing him in the preseason, I always felt he could contribute, so I hope he does well enough to warrant some short yardage touches.. But who better for a guy with his skill set to learn from than our current FullBack TRich!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to seeing him in the preseason, I always felt he could contribute, so I hope he does well enough to warrant some short yardage touches.. But who better for a guy with his skill set to learn from than our current FullBack TRich!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Caporoso</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163225</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Caporoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163225</guid>
		<description>Looking at J. Caulcrick and the rest of the Jets RBs in 2009:

http://turnonthejets.com/2009/06/22/jets-positional-analysis-running-back/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at J. Caulcrick and the rest of the Jets RBs in 2009:</p>
<p><a href="http://turnonthejets.com/2009/06/22/jets-positional-analysis-running-back/" rel="nofollow">http://turnonthejets.com/2009/06/22/jets-positional-analysis-running-back/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163220</link>
		<dc:creator>RKNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163220</guid>
		<description>I meant their styles are similar, as in N/S, bruiser types, but I think Jehuu is definitely more of an imposing presence.  Either way I&#039;d like to see them taking on DBs all game.  After 1Q the DBs will be sick of hitting them. 

I am in favor of them both being here.  They have tremendous upside, give us depth hopefully at the RB position, can replace T RIch when he&#039;s gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant their styles are similar, as in N/S, bruiser types, but I think Jehuu is definitely more of an imposing presence.  Either way I&#8217;d like to see them taking on DBs all game.  After 1Q the DBs will be sick of hitting them. </p>
<p>I am in favor of them both being here.  They have tremendous upside, give us depth hopefully at the RB position, can replace T RIch when he&#8217;s gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163218</link>
		<dc:creator>RKNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163218</guid>
		<description>http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jehuu-caulcrick?id=1355

Runs 4.41 in the 40.  Maybe NFL.com is wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jehuu-caulcrick?id=1355" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jehuu-caulcrick?id=1355</a></p>
<p>Runs 4.41 in the 40.  Maybe NFL.com is wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fonzie</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163204</link>
		<dc:creator>fonzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163204</guid>
		<description>Bent:

Green and Jehuu are similar but I feel Jehuu is stronger, quicker and can run to the outside. Plus knowing Jehuu&#039;s background he maybe hungrier. This appears as the same situation as drafting Franchez while never giving our three Amigos (Clemens, Ainge and Rattlif) a real look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bent:</p>
<p>Green and Jehuu are similar but I feel Jehuu is stronger, quicker and can run to the outside. Plus knowing Jehuu&#8217;s background he maybe hungrier. This appears as the same situation as drafting Franchez while never giving our three Amigos (Clemens, Ainge and Rattlif) a real look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163178</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163178</guid>
		<description>go irish


and jehuu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go irish</p>
<p>and jehuu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163173</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/22/film-room-jeehuuuuuuuu/#comment-163173</guid>
		<description>The two aren&#039;t similar at all really.  Caulcrick is 20 pounds heavier.  He will be a fullback, but as Sack says, they might be able to make use of his ball-carrying skills too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two aren&#8217;t similar at all really.  Caulcrick is 20 pounds heavier.  He will be a fullback, but as Sack says, they might be able to make use of his ball-carrying skills too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/324 objects using memcached

Served from: www.thejetsblog.com @ 2012-02-12 04:01:21 -->
