Comments on: Inside Out: Bryan Thomas

By: Inside Out: Bart Scott | JetsVine

Inside Out: Bart Scott | JetsVine — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:31:56 +0000

[...] Other Inside Out Posts: Kris Jenkins, Shaun Ellis, Marques Douglas,Calvin Pace, Bryan Thomas [...]

By: Pdubbs

Pdubbs — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:27:14 +0000

They should trade BT now for anything they can get…. Rex can figure out how to use what we have now, which on paper is not bad at all.

BT, Brad Smith for Braylon Edwards ????

By: fonzie

fonzie — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:09:14 +0000

I say Bryan Thomas changes his jersey number to 56. Just my two sense….

By: Inside Out: Bryan Thomas | JetsVine

Inside Out: Bryan Thomas | JetsVine — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:22:32 +0000

[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]

By: Harlan Lachman

Harlan Lachman — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:38:06 +0000

It is interesting to me that none of you see BLT as a bust — as I do.

A look at his stats and film shows he gets an occasional sack or tackle for a loss (or fumble). But unlike other supposed sack artists, he does not get a lot of pressures too, does not seal the edge well, is no threat dropping into coverage, and seems more pushable off the LOS than most.

Rex has his greatest challenge on this team on the outside of the front 7, OLBs and DEs. If he can get more out of Pace and anything out of BLT or VG, and anything out of our DEs, our D has the potential to be scary.

By: Mike S.

Mike S. — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:34:27 +0000

This guy needs to start playing with some roid rage

By: BubbyBrister/shovelpass

BubbyBrister/shovelpass — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:53:13 +0000

I only want BT on my team during his walk-year…

By: igs

igs — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:45:28 +0000

The room for this prototype LB is getting crowded. And I think Thomas is the guy that has to get squeezed out. He has underachieved and he makes a lot of $$$.

By: greene

greene — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:16:11 +0000

must have been very effective with zero ineffectiveness.

just messing with ya, i know what you meant.

By: greene

greene — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:15:34 +0000

zero ineffectiveness = good, no? :)