<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Out: Bart Scott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:18:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-165826</link>
		<dc:creator>rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-165826</guid>
		<description>Scott is a dud. This guy will prove what an idiot Rex is and will finally put an end to the Tannenbaum run at GM. Scott couldn&#039;t hold Ray Lewis jock strap and Newsome knows this well. Ozzie in fact overlooked the dummy Ryan and chose Harbaugh simply because Ryan is as dumb as they come. Ever hear of the expression &quot; like Father Like Son&quot;. It&#039;s truly amazing that so many Jet fans live in a world of fantasy. This team defense is on the way down. The only strong suit will be the CB&#039;s and I am so sick and tired of Rhodes and wish that they would finally trade this overrated bum with the big mouth who hasn&#039;t done anything on the field that makes you think that he is an elite SS. Yes Jet fans get ready for the 4-12 season which is ready to embark on the 3 stooges, Woody, Tannenbaum and Ryan. I just don&#039;t understand how so many fans can be so blinded and not accept the fact that their beloved team is weaker this year than last. Yep get ready for 4-12. Without question if anyone can be honest with themselves they should recognize that this team has a much greater chance of starting the season at 0-4 than 4-0. Oh well I guess you will all have to wait for the agony of another lost season and another idiot hire of the spoon fed billionaire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott is a dud. This guy will prove what an idiot Rex is and will finally put an end to the Tannenbaum run at GM. Scott couldn&#8217;t hold Ray Lewis jock strap and Newsome knows this well. Ozzie in fact overlooked the dummy Ryan and chose Harbaugh simply because Ryan is as dumb as they come. Ever hear of the expression &#8221; like Father Like Son&#8221;. It&#8217;s truly amazing that so many Jet fans live in a world of fantasy. This team defense is on the way down. The only strong suit will be the CB&#8217;s and I am so sick and tired of Rhodes and wish that they would finally trade this overrated bum with the big mouth who hasn&#8217;t done anything on the field that makes you think that he is an elite SS. Yes Jet fans get ready for the 4-12 season which is ready to embark on the 3 stooges, Woody, Tannenbaum and Ryan. I just don&#8217;t understand how so many fans can be so blinded and not accept the fact that their beloved team is weaker this year than last. Yep get ready for 4-12. Without question if anyone can be honest with themselves they should recognize that this team has a much greater chance of starting the season at 0-4 than 4-0. Oh well I guess you will all have to wait for the agony of another lost season and another idiot hire of the spoon fed billionaire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164170</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164170</guid>
		<description>Brad R.,

Yes, Canty is a physical specimen, but Scott&#039;s a &quot;mad backer.&quot;  A guy with a high football IQ, non-stop motor and leadership skills.  Those guys are just as rare.  I mean James Harrison is 31, 6-0 and 240 lbs...don&#039;t you think he&#039;d get even more than Scott and Canty if he came on the market?  Plus, how much stronger a supporting cast does Canty need?  He played in front of Ware, who had 20 sacks...one of the 10 best seasons of all-time.  Ratliff at NT is a Pro Bowler, Greg Ellis at LDE has played at a high-level for a long time.  I mean, the Jets spent money on a guy who is at his peak...you&#039;re projecting greatness for Canty, but he&#039;s not there, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad R.,</p>
<p>Yes, Canty is a physical specimen, but Scott&#8217;s a &#8220;mad backer.&#8221;  A guy with a high football IQ, non-stop motor and leadership skills.  Those guys are just as rare.  I mean James Harrison is 31, 6-0 and 240 lbs&#8230;don&#8217;t you think he&#8217;d get even more than Scott and Canty if he came on the market?  Plus, how much stronger a supporting cast does Canty need?  He played in front of Ware, who had 20 sacks&#8230;one of the 10 best seasons of all-time.  Ratliff at NT is a Pro Bowler, Greg Ellis at LDE has played at a high-level for a long time.  I mean, the Jets spent money on a guy who is at his peak&#8230;you&#8217;re projecting greatness for Canty, but he&#8217;s not there, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164169</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164169</guid>
		<description>Cabras,

Passing game much worse?  The only thing that I&#039;ll say about the passing game is that the Jets will pass drastically less than last year.  The offense was dominated by the pass last season...the Jets passed 529 times to 422 rushes.  I see the reverse this season.  And, even if you predict injuries to the OL, such injuries would impact the pass more than the run.  The offense will be different...more rushing, more ball control, more short to intermediate passes.  I expect a lot of &quot;war of attrition&quot; games, which the Jets will be well-suited to winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cabras,</p>
<p>Passing game much worse?  The only thing that I&#8217;ll say about the passing game is that the Jets will pass drastically less than last year.  The offense was dominated by the pass last season&#8230;the Jets passed 529 times to 422 rushes.  I see the reverse this season.  And, even if you predict injuries to the OL, such injuries would impact the pass more than the run.  The offense will be different&#8230;more rushing, more ball control, more short to intermediate passes.  I expect a lot of &#8220;war of attrition&#8221; games, which the Jets will be well-suited to winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164167</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164167</guid>
		<description>I agree - different situations.  But Canty is coming into his prime and has continued to improve.  And guys that are 6&#039;7, 300lbs with good athleticism are harder to find then a 6&#039;2, 240lb inside linebacker. Canty is only a 4 year player and with the strong supporting cast of the giants (as he would have had with the Jets) I think he will be dominant, if he&#039;s not quite there yet. 

Good points though, Sack, and I do think Scott will be worth it.  I just wish he was a little younger and cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; different situations.  But Canty is coming into his prime and has continued to improve.  And guys that are 6&#8242;7, 300lbs with good athleticism are harder to find then a 6&#8242;2, 240lb inside linebacker. Canty is only a 4 year player and with the strong supporting cast of the giants (as he would have had with the Jets) I think he will be dominant, if he&#8217;s not quite there yet. </p>
<p>Good points though, Sack, and I do think Scott will be worth it.  I just wish he was a little younger and cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164165</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164165</guid>
		<description>Brad R,

Different situations.  Scott had to be lured away from Baltimore, while the Cowboys couldn&#039;t afford to keep Canty.  Scott made the Pro Bowl in &#039;06, is in his prime and was signed to be the defensive captain of the Jets.  Canty&#039;s a nice player, but will he even start for the Giants?  And, while Scott&#039;s older, he only has 1 more year of starts (and just 10 at that) under his belt and ILBs tend to last longer than D-linemen.  Last point, while Scott&#039;s contract is more, it&#039;s not like it&#039;s outrageously more...$6M more over 6 years.  And, isn&#039;t he worth it?  I mean hasn&#039;t he been a better ILB than Canty has been a DE?  Canty is not a dominant player...no Pro Bowls and never more than 3.5 sacks on the weakside...just from cleaning up for Ware, he should get 8-10.  He&#039;s a nice player, but dominant?!?  No way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad R,</p>
<p>Different situations.  Scott had to be lured away from Baltimore, while the Cowboys couldn&#8217;t afford to keep Canty.  Scott made the Pro Bowl in &#8216;06, is in his prime and was signed to be the defensive captain of the Jets.  Canty&#8217;s a nice player, but will he even start for the Giants?  And, while Scott&#8217;s older, he only has 1 more year of starts (and just 10 at that) under his belt and ILBs tend to last longer than D-linemen.  Last point, while Scott&#8217;s contract is more, it&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s outrageously more&#8230;$6M more over 6 years.  And, isn&#8217;t he worth it?  I mean hasn&#8217;t he been a better ILB than Canty has been a DE?  Canty is not a dominant player&#8230;no Pro Bowls and never more than 3.5 sacks on the weakside&#8230;just from cleaning up for Ware, he should get 8-10.  He&#8217;s a nice player, but dominant?!?  No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cabras</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164158</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164158</guid>
		<description>Sack,

Nice rubuttal, 23-25 over three years, 27-37 over 4 years. 3 coaches in 4 years, zero consistency.

Ok we are in the middle, it just feels like the bottom when we share the city w/NYG.

I am not into stats, they are very misleading. I judge on W&#039;s and L&#039;s and playoff births. The playoff teams last year probably had worse stats than we did, but they were in the playoffs. 

I disagree about the O, I like the line although we have no depth, hope we do not get an injury, also our passing game will be much worse than last year, which should have an adverse affect on our run game.

Not sure I see more than 8 wins. Good Blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sack,</p>
<p>Nice rubuttal, 23-25 over three years, 27-37 over 4 years. 3 coaches in 4 years, zero consistency.</p>
<p>Ok we are in the middle, it just feels like the bottom when we share the city w/NYG.</p>
<p>I am not into stats, they are very misleading. I judge on W&#8217;s and L&#8217;s and playoff births. The playoff teams last year probably had worse stats than we did, but they were in the playoffs. </p>
<p>I disagree about the O, I like the line although we have no depth, hope we do not get an injury, also our passing game will be much worse than last year, which should have an adverse affect on our run game.</p>
<p>Not sure I see more than 8 wins. Good Blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R.</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164157</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164157</guid>
		<description>I am excited about Scott and I think aside from his talent on the field, his ability to help translate Rex Ryan&#039;s scheme to the rest of the defense is huge.  But did we overpay a bit?  The Giants signed Canty, a stud DE/DT to a 6 years, 42 million contract.  Not only is Canty 3 or 4 years younger than Scott, he has the size and athleticism to play in the 3-4 or 4-3.  Canty can set the edge, he can stuff up the middle, he can rush the passer, he is a dominant player.  ILB&#039;s shouldn&#039;t cost more than harder-to-find versatile linemen, should they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited about Scott and I think aside from his talent on the field, his ability to help translate Rex Ryan&#8217;s scheme to the rest of the defense is huge.  But did we overpay a bit?  The Giants signed Canty, a stud DE/DT to a 6 years, 42 million contract.  Not only is Canty 3 or 4 years younger than Scott, he has the size and athleticism to play in the 3-4 or 4-3.  Canty can set the edge, he can stuff up the middle, he can rush the passer, he is a dominant player.  ILB&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t cost more than harder-to-find versatile linemen, should they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164156</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164156</guid>
		<description>And, I think the whole &quot;rookie coach and QB&quot; thing is overblown.  The Jets defense is a veteran squad, the OL is playing 2 years together and all 5 are vets.  TJ, Leon and T-Rich are vets.  The special teams coach and offensive coordinator have been around for, respectively, 8 and 4 seasons.  This team is, in large part, a turnkey operation.  So, I don&#039;t think the coaching change created the type of upheaval that went into Groh-Edwards or Edwards-Mangini (where the offense and defense were changed) and, ironically, both Herm and Eric went to the playoffs their first seasons.

The biggest issue is QB, that&#039;s why I think the Jets will struggle to score more than 350 points.  But, if they score 360 and give up 290...that sounds like, at least, a 9-7 team (and likely better).  I think most people look at the uncertain QB situation and suspect WRs and assume the Jets won&#039;t score...the team scored 405 points last season and that&#039;s with Favre tossing 22 INTs.  How much worse do you think the offense will be?  To be one of the 10 worst, the Jets need lots of things to go wrong...inept QB play and a decimated OL...let&#039;s hope that doesn&#039;t happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, I think the whole &#8220;rookie coach and QB&#8221; thing is overblown.  The Jets defense is a veteran squad, the OL is playing 2 years together and all 5 are vets.  TJ, Leon and T-Rich are vets.  The special teams coach and offensive coordinator have been around for, respectively, 8 and 4 seasons.  This team is, in large part, a turnkey operation.  So, I don&#8217;t think the coaching change created the type of upheaval that went into Groh-Edwards or Edwards-Mangini (where the offense and defense were changed) and, ironically, both Herm and Eric went to the playoffs their first seasons.</p>
<p>The biggest issue is QB, that&#8217;s why I think the Jets will struggle to score more than 350 points.  But, if they score 360 and give up 290&#8230;that sounds like, at least, a 9-7 team (and likely better).  I think most people look at the uncertain QB situation and suspect WRs and assume the Jets won&#8217;t score&#8230;the team scored 405 points last season and that&#8217;s with Favre tossing 22 INTs.  How much worse do you think the offense will be?  To be one of the 10 worst, the Jets need lots of things to go wrong&#8230;inept QB play and a decimated OL&#8230;let&#8217;s hope that doesn&#8217;t happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SackDance99</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164152</link>
		<dc:creator>SackDance99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164152</guid>
		<description>Cabras,

The Jets are at the bottom?  The team was 9-7 last year and 23-25 over 3 years...nearly .500 (they&#039;re also 2 under for the decade and 8 games over .500 since Parcells set the team on a different direction in 1997...we like to complain as Jets fans, but the Jets have been, basically, a .500 team for over 10 years).  If you want to see a &quot;bottom&quot; team, follow Detroit or Cleveland.

The Jets offense scored over 400 points last year.  I don&#039;t see that happening.  The Jets defense gave up over 350 points.  I don&#039;t see that happening, either.  If the Jets hold the opposition under 300 points, which is possible (7 teams did that last year, only the Skins failed to make the playoffs), and the offense scores over 300 points (only 8 teams failed to do that last year), then I do see the Jets being better than 8-8.  In my mind, there&#039;s no question that the defense is improved with the additions of Scott, Leonhard and Sheppard.  The special teams should be the same or better (Leonhard&#039;s probably a more consistent PR than Leon and the defense should force more 3 and outs).  Also, I respect Rex&#039;s defensive acumen; I think teams will struggle scoring TDs on the Jets.  On the offensive side, however, there&#039;s lots of question marks.  I&#039;ll say this much, if the Jets somehow score more than 400 points (9 teams did so last season), they&#039;ll likely be well into double-digit wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cabras,</p>
<p>The Jets are at the bottom?  The team was 9-7 last year and 23-25 over 3 years&#8230;nearly .500 (they&#8217;re also 2 under for the decade and 8 games over .500 since Parcells set the team on a different direction in 1997&#8230;we like to complain as Jets fans, but the Jets have been, basically, a .500 team for over 10 years).  If you want to see a &#8220;bottom&#8221; team, follow Detroit or Cleveland.</p>
<p>The Jets offense scored over 400 points last year.  I don&#8217;t see that happening.  The Jets defense gave up over 350 points.  I don&#8217;t see that happening, either.  If the Jets hold the opposition under 300 points, which is possible (7 teams did that last year, only the Skins failed to make the playoffs), and the offense scores over 300 points (only 8 teams failed to do that last year), then I do see the Jets being better than 8-8.  In my mind, there&#8217;s no question that the defense is improved with the additions of Scott, Leonhard and Sheppard.  The special teams should be the same or better (Leonhard&#8217;s probably a more consistent PR than Leon and the defense should force more 3 and outs).  Also, I respect Rex&#8217;s defensive acumen; I think teams will struggle scoring TDs on the Jets.  On the offensive side, however, there&#8217;s lots of question marks.  I&#8217;ll say this much, if the Jets somehow score more than 400 points (9 teams did so last season), they&#8217;ll likely be well into double-digit wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cabras</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/comment-page-1/#comment-164150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/06/29/inside-out-bart-scott/#comment-164150</guid>
		<description>Sack,

Good Points.
The good teams (Philly, NYG, NE) signed FA players as a plug in to take them over the top. We are at the bottom, Do you actually see this team winning more than 8-9 games this year? I like the signing, but am not sure that B Scott actually will bring more wins to this team. Our D would have been very good without him, our O, that is another story. Do you think a rookie coach and QB combo can make the NFL playoffs 2 years in a row?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sack,</p>
<p>Good Points.<br />
The good teams (Philly, NYG, NE) signed FA players as a plug in to take them over the top. We are at the bottom, Do you actually see this team winning more than 8-9 games this year? I like the signing, but am not sure that B Scott actually will bring more wins to this team. Our D would have been very good without him, our O, that is another story. Do you think a rookie coach and QB combo can make the NFL playoffs 2 years in a row?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
