avatar

Daily Links: Live From the UK

by Bent on October 24th, 2009 at 10:48 am

Corey’s unavailable today (I blame the Jets’ strength and conditioning coaches), so I’m stepping in with some links and other content to keep you entertained, before I head off to London to throw eggs at the Patriots’ hotel…

- Thomas Jones will run and run…for 4 or 5 more years…perhaps going against the best advice of these fans:

TJ

- PFT’s Saturday one-liners reveal that the Jets are going to mix up their blitz packages and that the Bills DC Perry Fewell is downplaying all the rushing yards they gave up against the Jets, because of all the big plays. Since when was the lead singer of Jane’s Addiction their defensive co-ordinator, anyway?

- An article about the Jets and WCW. (That’s West Coast Woes, not World Championship Wrestling, but with the lack of line depth, maybe they should consider bringing in Ron Simmons even if he is over 50.)

- With no Rex Ryan (and no Bart Scott, Jim Leonhard and Marques Douglas), the Ravens defense needs to get better.

- With no Braylon Edwards, the Browns need to stop dropping passes. Wait…what?

- This has absolutely nothing to do with the NFL, but the headline seems apt.

- Would the Jets have been any better off if they pursued Matt Cassel instead of trading up for Sanchez? Not based on how he’s played so far.

- And finally, now that a “humbled” Tom Cable has been cleared, now he can concentrate on coaching the Raiders. Uh-oh?

12 Responses to Daily Links: Live From the UK

  1. avatar hank/naples says:

    Bent;

    Comparing Franchez to Cassell is like comparing the Jets OL to KC”s. Do you really think is close?

  2. avatar Bent says:

    Personally, I’m not really a fan of Cassel and think that in the long term, he wouldn’t have been good value for money. Sanchez might not pan out either, but I think I’d prefer developing him than bringing in Cassel, even though he’s more “NFL ready”.

    Both are struggling right now, although Sanchez landed in a much better situation, so has fewer excuses. Longer term, I hope Sanchez would prove to be better than Cassel’s ceiling which I don’t think is all that high, but I’d be interested in the views of others.

  3. avatar Wise Old Jet Fan says:

    Jets would have been better off drafting Crabtree and signing Jeff Garcia.

    They could then have drafted a QB in the very deep 2010 draft and would not have needed to trade for Edwards, who may not even be here next year.

  4. avatar Wise Old Jet Fan says:

    Jets are flying into a bad situation, the Raiders and their coach seem to have righted the ship, Seymour has accepted the trade and seems out to prove he still has it, and Russell looked a bit like an NFL QB for the first time in last weeks second half.

    And the are simply a better team without forcing the ball to McDaddy.

    With Jenkins out you Fantasy Football Fanatics better have Fargas active.

  5. avatar hank/naples says:

    Bent :

    On a side note.

    It looks like the NF does come in all flavors and may be comming to your neighborhood store after all.

    http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/football/story/1296866.html

    Mexico is also beign considered.

    Wonder how Sanchez would look like in a Mexican Sombrero, you know, with all the pom,pom balls hanging off it. Hey GQ, what do you think?

  6. avatar Bent says:

    Thanks for the link, Hank. None of this is news to me, because they’ve been saying these things over here for a while. I think the novelty factor is going to wear off and interest will wane before they ever get close to an NBA or NFL franchise over here, but we shall see.

    I don’t think the casual fan will enjoy this year’s London game much because I don’t expect Pats-Bucs to be especially compelling!

    I’d have thought the Jets would be a shoo-in for the next Mexico game because of the Sanchez factor, which hopefully reduces the chances of the Jets having to play a game in England.

  7. avatar hank/naples says:

    Bent:

    Football being prodominantlhy a business (or so I hear from most TJB fans) I can’t see TannWoody not push for those market $$$$$. As I discussed with you, I can see an INT”L League sooner rather than later

  8. avatar hank/naples says:

    WiseOldJetFan:

    You’re a Wise Old Jet Fan.

  9. avatar Wise Old Jet Fan says:

    Well, thanks Hank.

  10. avatar supercooljetfan says:

    i dont think cassell is all that good and he was more of a product of n.e. system that kept him from putting the team on his shoulders…2 reasons why we shouldnt have went after cassell last off season is hes not that good and was gonna play poorly after he left the pats. and the pats will never do a deal with us after spygate especially you can bet that the jets and pats will never trade amongst eachother for a very long time…theres a reason why cassell never started a game in college

  11. avatar supercooljetfan says:

    why must we go over and play games in england they dont even like football that much and to even think about having a superbowl over there is crazy its not like they will ever have a english soccer league championship game over here in the good u.s. of a….plus the euro is crushing the dollar which will make it hard for an american to go over there and watch their team play

  12. avatar Bent says:

    I agree having a superbowl (or a franchise) over here is probably not going to work.

    The reason they’ve done it is obvious: to make money from European fans. The games have been a sell-out, but the crowd has been filled with fans who were there for the novelty value and got bored by halftime and spent the entire second half doing the wave.

    That’s hardly the atmosphere an NFL player dreams of in their quest to get to the Superbowl (although I get the fact that there is always a more corporate feel to that game). Other than the halftime show, there’s no real reason that casual British fans would be any more likely to attend the Superbowl than just a regular season game, so they should just leave it at that.

    NFL popularity in this country may be set to fade. We used to get 7 games a week, this year we get 3.

    They had a London franchise in the old WLAF (World League of American Football) and fans went while they were unbeaten and World Bowl champions, but the support died out once they lost a few, which underlines the fact that a London franchise would struggle to put together a loyal enough fanbase to be successful. Most serious NFL fans over here already are loyal NFL fans anyway and I can’t see many of those switching allegiances to a London team.

    Interestingly, they floated the idea of having one English premier league regular season soccer game in the USA a few years ago and soccer fans over here went ballistic, saying they would never watch the EPL again and that it would be a total sell out and completely unfair. I never quite understood that reaction, but it underlines SCJF’s point well.