<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Links: h4&#215;0r3d 3d!t1oN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:18:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik Manassy</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204779</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Manassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204779</guid>
		<description>Yes, as I stated in the article (I wrote the piece), I say &quot; I am not saying Mark Sanchez is the next Peyton Manning, but I am saying that we owe it to Mark, Rex and the entire Jets organization to give him a chance.&quot;

I read a couple comments above and agree that this was not meant to be used as a crystal ball or it was not my intent to put koolaide in your drink to think Sanchez is on the same path Manning.  I kept hearing (I wasn&#039;t the FIRST) to compare Mark to Peyton in his rookie year, so it was bothering me I couldn&#039;t find the comparison.  

I decided to whip something up with my opinions.  I do love the debate it has caused.  If you ask me do I want Mark to grow up and be Peyton, ABSOLUTELY, who wouldn&#039;t, but the article never says &quot;Don&#039;t worry Jets fans, look Mark is doing better so he&#039;ll win the Superbowl and 5 MVPS!&quot;

That would be &quot;Delusional&quot;!  Thanks for reading guys and gals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as I stated in the article (I wrote the piece), I say &#8221; I am not saying Mark Sanchez is the next Peyton Manning, but I am saying that we owe it to Mark, Rex and the entire Jets organization to give him a chance.&#8221;</p>
<p>I read a couple comments above and agree that this was not meant to be used as a crystal ball or it was not my intent to put koolaide in your drink to think Sanchez is on the same path Manning.  I kept hearing (I wasn&#8217;t the FIRST) to compare Mark to Peyton in his rookie year, so it was bothering me I couldn&#8217;t find the comparison.  </p>
<p>I decided to whip something up with my opinions.  I do love the debate it has caused.  If you ask me do I want Mark to grow up and be Peyton, ABSOLUTELY, who wouldn&#8217;t, but the article never says &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry Jets fans, look Mark is doing better so he&#8217;ll win the Superbowl and 5 MVPS!&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be &#8220;Delusional&#8221;!  Thanks for reading guys and gals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204642</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204642</guid>
		<description>Hank,

No one, repeat: no one, is saying Sanchez is the next Manning. We&#039;re simply using Manning&#039;s first 10 games, when compared to Sanchez&#039;s first 10 games, to show that it is possible to improve epically from such a poor start to a career. I don&#039;t know why this is delusional in your opinion, because Peyton isn&#039;t the only QB Sanchez gets compared to.

As for your comment to starz, &quot;Therefore the only rule, I believe applicable, is that both players must be facing each other when intentional contact occurs.&quot; Well, that is what happened. Poteat faced up and blocked Calvin Johnson from coming back to the ball. That is not allowed, and when you&#039;re standing one on one with a receiver in the endzone (not in a crowd of people) it will get called. Most hail mary&#039;s have hand fighting and jostling for position, they don&#039;t have defenders pushing receivers out of the area. Mangini will lose his complaint with the league, just like he&#039;s destined to lose 14-15 games this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank,</p>
<p>No one, repeat: no one, is saying Sanchez is the next Manning. We&#8217;re simply using Manning&#8217;s first 10 games, when compared to Sanchez&#8217;s first 10 games, to show that it is possible to improve epically from such a poor start to a career. I don&#8217;t know why this is delusional in your opinion, because Peyton isn&#8217;t the only QB Sanchez gets compared to.</p>
<p>As for your comment to starz, &#8220;Therefore the only rule, I believe applicable, is that both players must be facing each other when intentional contact occurs.&#8221; Well, that is what happened. Poteat faced up and blocked Calvin Johnson from coming back to the ball. That is not allowed, and when you&#8217;re standing one on one with a receiver in the endzone (not in a crowd of people) it will get called. Most hail mary&#8217;s have hand fighting and jostling for position, they don&#8217;t have defenders pushing receivers out of the area. Mangini will lose his complaint with the league, just like he&#8217;s destined to lose 14-15 games this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Links: h4×0r3d 3d!t1oN &#124; JetsVine</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204531</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Links: h4×0r3d 3d!t1oN &#124; JetsVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204531</guid>
		<description>[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thejetsblog.com. Please read the complete article and let us know what you think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank/naples</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204491</link>
		<dc:creator>hank/naples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204491</guid>
		<description>starz31:

In my humble opinion, during that play, every player in the end zone is an elegible receiver. Therefore the only rule, I believe applicable, is that both players must be facing each other when intentional contact occurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starz31:</p>
<p>In my humble opinion, during that play, every player in the end zone is an elegible receiver. Therefore the only rule, I believe applicable, is that both players must be facing each other when intentional contact occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank/naples</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204486</link>
		<dc:creator>hank/naples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204486</guid>
		<description>Brendan;

I understand how the play went, It is just plain dumb to call a penalty then when they could call MILLIONS of other penalties during MILLIONS of Hail Marys&#039;. Dumb, just plain dumb.
And I know, Mangini has a history as a sore loser, Big Mouth that has only coached football like 20 years, and has NEVER been involved in that play. That is why he is getting film and petitioning to the league because &quot;he had never seen that penalty called  before&quot;.

Also, the only similarity worth comparing Payton to Franchez is that they both played football. Anything else infers, suggests, encourages one to believe that they share the same past, they may be destined to share the same future. 

Like I said, dillusional, pie in the sky rhetoric that can, and likely will end in disappointment, as true Jets fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan;</p>
<p>I understand how the play went, It is just plain dumb to call a penalty then when they could call MILLIONS of other penalties during MILLIONS of Hail Marys&#8217;. Dumb, just plain dumb.<br />
And I know, Mangini has a history as a sore loser, Big Mouth that has only coached football like 20 years, and has NEVER been involved in that play. That is why he is getting film and petitioning to the league because &#8220;he had never seen that penalty called  before&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, the only similarity worth comparing Payton to Franchez is that they both played football. Anything else infers, suggests, encourages one to believe that they share the same past, they may be destined to share the same future. </p>
<p>Like I said, dillusional, pie in the sky rhetoric that can, and likely will end in disappointment, as true Jets fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204463</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204463</guid>
		<description>*before the ball is thrown, after the ball is released it then becomes pass interference territory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*before the ball is thrown, after the ball is released it then becomes pass interference territory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204457</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204457</guid>
		<description>starz,

I&#039;m not sure where this idea came from that illegal contact doesn&#039;t exist once the QB moves outside the pocket came from. If that was the case, any time a QB rolled out DB&#039;s would just hit receivers as hard as they could and knock them down or out of bounds. &quot;Hey! QB&#039;s outside the pocket, no illegal contact!&quot; Yeah, that would be bad for the league.

Illegal contact can occur, regardless of where the QB is (obviously behind the line of scrimmage) as long as contact is initiated by the defensive player past 5 yards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starz,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where this idea came from that illegal contact doesn&#8217;t exist once the QB moves outside the pocket came from. If that was the case, any time a QB rolled out DB&#8217;s would just hit receivers as hard as they could and knock them down or out of bounds. &#8220;Hey! QB&#8217;s outside the pocket, no illegal contact!&#8221; Yeah, that would be bad for the league.</p>
<p>Illegal contact can occur, regardless of where the QB is (obviously behind the line of scrimmage) as long as contact is initiated by the defensive player past 5 yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scouse Jet</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204454</link>
		<dc:creator>Scouse Jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204454</guid>
		<description>Then what is the point?
Who would you compare him to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then what is the point?<br />
Who would you compare him to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starz31</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204452</link>
		<dc:creator>starz31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204452</guid>
		<description>All the comparisons I&#039;ve read in the media, including the link above,  all use the qualifier that they are not saying Mark Sanchez will be Peyton Manning.  That is not the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the comparisons I&#8217;ve read in the media, including the link above,  all use the qualifier that they are not saying Mark Sanchez will be Peyton Manning.  That is not the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starz31</title>
		<link>http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/comment-page-1/#comment-204450</link>
		<dc:creator>starz31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/11/24/daily-links-h4x0r3d-3dt1on/#comment-204450</guid>
		<description>Back to the ruling...

The TV broadcast (again, not sure if it was the Jets or the Colts game prior)  stated that once the QB leaves the pocket, the defense is allowed to make contact downfield.  But only if the ball hasn&#039;t been thrown yet, in which case, would result in PI....

Is this true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the ruling&#8230;</p>
<p>The TV broadcast (again, not sure if it was the Jets or the Colts game prior)  stated that once the QB leaves the pocket, the defense is allowed to make contact downfield.  But only if the ball hasn&#8217;t been thrown yet, in which case, would result in PI&#8230;.</p>
<p>Is this true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
