Comments on: Matthew gets a Mulligan http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/ Ranting and Raving about the Gang Green Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bent http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206701 Bent Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:51:24 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206701 Interesting idea. We'll see if it happens. If not, I guess it's because Slauson doesn't have experience at tackle and therefore Mulligan would be more comfortable (maybe he plays special teams better too?) Mulligan isn't much of a receiving threat but he's more athletic than Hartsock. Interesting idea. We’ll see if it happens. If not, I guess it’s because Slauson doesn’t have experience at tackle and therefore Mulligan would be more comfortable (maybe he plays special teams better too?)

Mulligan isn’t much of a receiving threat but he’s more athletic than Hartsock.

]]> By: JetOrange http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206699 JetOrange Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:27:40 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206699 Again I am curious if Slauson if Slauson has progressed enough to be activated.. Mulligan is a cheap alternative to Hartsock, and is he more of a receiving threat ? Again I am curious if Slauson if Slauson has progressed enough to be activated.. Mulligan is a cheap alternative to Hartsock, and is he more of a receiving threat ?

]]> By: Fred http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206697 Fred Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:15:46 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206697 *sure *sure

]]> By: Fred http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206696 Fred Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:15:15 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206696 On a short week im more he's just a safer option than Hartsock because regardleses all their really going to do is block. On a short week im more he’s just a safer option than Hartsock because regardleses all their really going to do is block.

]]> By: JetOrange http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206695 JetOrange Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:13:09 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206695 Bent, with Turner being out, would Slauson be a candidate to take the Turner role in the jumbo set ? it will be interesting to see if he is activated for the first time this year... Bent, with Turner being out, would Slauson be a candidate to take the Turner role in the jumbo set ? it will be interesting to see if he is activated for the first time this year…

]]> By: Jake D. http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206693 Jake D. Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:34:30 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206693 I'm going to school now, so I thought I'd post and say, LETS GO JETS! I’m going to school now, so I thought I’d post and say, LETS GO JETS!

]]> By: Bent http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206691 Bent Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:22:32 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206691 Drew - the reason he's being activated is that Rob Turner is hurt, so they need an extra blocking TE for short yardage sets. Drew – the reason he’s being activated is that Rob Turner is hurt, so they need an extra blocking TE for short yardage sets.

]]> By: JetOrange http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206689 JetOrange Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:07:33 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206689 This is part of the evaluation process for next year,competition for Hartsock, and a way of rewarding one of those eight guys on the PS ( I think their game check goes from 5,000 as a PS guy to about 24,000). So in the last 5 games he makes 125,000, enough to encourage a major committment to the program. for the off season... Apparently the Jets believe he has a future here This is part of the evaluation process for next year,competition for Hartsock, and a way of rewarding one of those eight guys on the PS ( I think their game check goes from 5,000 as a PS guy to about 24,000). So in the last 5 games he makes 125,000, enough to encourage a major committment to the program. for the off season… Apparently the Jets believe he has a future here

]]> By: AKA...Drew http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206681 AKA...Drew Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:49:17 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206681 I am wondering why we need 3 TE's not counting the LS on the roster this week? Didnt we rush for over 300 yards against this defense 4 weeks ago? Not sure why this guy is needed unless Hartstock is in the real doghouse and wont play. I am wondering why we need 3 TE’s not counting the LS on the roster this week?

Didnt we rush for over 300 yards against this defense 4 weeks ago? Not sure why this guy is needed unless Hartstock is in the real doghouse and wont play.

]]> By: NYJ09 http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/12/02/matthew-gets-a-mulligan/#comment-206673 NYJ09 Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:37:51 +0000 http://www.thejetsblog.com/?p=18855#comment-206673 Jenkins didn't damage any other ligaments, it was a clean tear and he should make a full recovery they said. Leon Washington is the one we should be worried about, hopefully he'll still be the same player next season but that's hard to imagine considering how severe his injury was. Jenkins didn’t damage any other ligaments, it was a clean tear and he should make a full recovery they said. Leon Washington is the one we should be worried about, hopefully he’ll still be the same player next season but that’s hard to imagine considering how severe his injury was.

]]>