Quick trivia question. Until the start of this season, who was the longest tenured and starting player on the Jets defense?
Easy one right? Shaun “The Dean” Ellis.
Here’s a harder one, who was the second longest player for this Jets defense?
Would you believe it was Kerry Rhodes?
Hard to believe isn’t it? Since joining the team in 2005 as a guy who came to safety late after playing some quarterback at Louisville, all Rhodes did was work his way into not only a quality starting safety for the team, but an impact player. Ironically, he wasn’t the safety drafted that year that everyone expected to come out of camp with a job, initially it was hard hitter and fifth rounder Andre Maddox, whom legend tells Parcells with the Cowboys at the time, called the Jets front office after the pick, congratulating them on stealing his guy.
Humble Beginnings to Lofty Heights
As a fourth rounder, his play in his early seasons increased his notoriety among Jets fans, until he became something of a well-kept secret. In just his second season, Rhodes put together Pro Bowl numbers, but didn’t have the reputation to carry him to Hawaii. That coming offseasn, while Rhodes was working for it on the field, he got more savvy about PR, maybe as a means to help bridge the gap of his play and his Q Score. The dashing Rhodes — who had wanted to be an actor anyway — was working to increase his reputation away from the field as well, he’d started working with a PR agency that helped him get some publicity through acting, public appearances and even a few well-placed nights out on the town with female celebs. In no time, Rhodes was rubbing shoulders with Jamie Foxx and other celebs that more fit with his “Hollywood” nickname.
Still, after just one year with gaudy numbers for the football punditry, it really wasn’t until 2007 that things really kicked up for the young safety. Peter King named Rhodes #29 on his Top 500 players in football list, during 2007 and by the end of that year, the safety had put together the following impact numbers between 2006-2007: 23 passes defensed, seven sacks, five forced fumbles and nine interceptions. Not bad for a guy who starts as far away from the ball as possible.
Or was supposed to be. As much as Jonathan Vilma was a help to Rhodes discipline, work ethic and film study, it was his inability in the 3-4 that allowed him to be the fourth and a half linebacker for the team, which helped him register all those impact plays. Without Vilma and with Harris and now Jenkins, his helpfulness up front was limited. 2008 was a down year for many reasons and Bent addressed them stellarly in this analysis last January.
Brett Favre’s play down the stretch deflated the team, and most of the team felt disconnected to their coach and Rhodes was not immune. To boil it down though, the biggest cause for Rhodes’ decline was threefold (1) he was a victim of his own success (teams looked away from him) and (2) while the personnel improved ahead of him they declined in his unit (Lowery & Elam – with respect to Revis), and it (3) limited how they used him in their scheme (cover help only).
A Clean Break and Expectation Station
With the firing of Eric Mangini and the hiring of Rex Ryan, the Ed Reed comparisons couldn’t come surface quick enough, from everyone involved: the coaching staff, his teammates the press, the fans and even Rhodes himself:
Rex Ryan at his first presser:
Ed Reed is a great example. Ed Reed and Kerry Rhodes. I’m excited to see and coach Kerry. Ed has a reputation of being a freelance guy, but Ed plays in the structure of our defense and whether you want to believe it or not, it’s the case. We’ll let him know where the traps are, we’ll set traps and all that, and the thing that Ed did is take advantage of the opportunities that he got and that’s something that we’ve got to understand. It’s not just one guy doing his own thing out there. It’s all 11 doing what we’re supposed to be doing and doing it in a fashion where it’s physical and aggressive always.
Representative press quote from SI:
the most intriguing part of the new-look Jets, though, could be the secondary. Leonhard was the perfect complement to Baltimore’s Ed Reed, who finished 2008 with nine interceptions. Expect Jets safety Kerry Rhodes to see an increase from his two interceptions in ’08. The over-under starts at four picks. Take the over.
“We’ve got a free safety [Rhodes] that’s a ball hawk and, to me, the best corner in football,” Ryan said of Darrelle Revis. “That’s a pretty good starting point.”
Calvin Pace after Ryan’s first presser:
“I guess you look at it like who are you going to be in that defense. I’m looking at Jarret Johnson and Terrell Suggs,” Pace said of the Ravens’ outside linebackers. “Which one of those guys am I going to be? I would guess Kerry [Rhodes] would be happy because you see Ed Reed making the plays that he makes. Hopefully we all can mold into what those guys have done.”
Kerry Rhodes after Ryan’s first presser:
“Ed Reed is a special player, but it’s the way he’s used,”
“He has a guy next to him he can trust, so he can take chances and freelance. That’s the most important thing to me. If the coaches have confidence in the guy next to me, I can go out and make as many plays as Ed Reed.”
The same Ed Reed who was an All-Pro safety for the Ravens. The same Ed Reed who was pedigreed at “The U” and led a pro quality defense while he was there, and had been now doing for the better part of a decade. The same Ed Reed, who had been in the system for years, and who bought into it in full.
So with the the expectation that Ed Reed and Kerry Rhodes were valid comparisons starting on Day One, I think it came down to bad expectations all around. Everyone expected him to shoot out of a cannon Week One as Ed Reed, and it just never happened, for whatever reason.
While you see Pace mention Terrell Suggs … how come that didn’t stick like the Ed Reed comparisons? But Ed Reed stuck … maybe it was because the Jets drafted Bryan Thomas in 2002 when Ed Reed was drafted only two slots behind him? Were we in the press and we in the fan base (I consider myself both) making unfair comparisons? I don’t know … just a thought.
Irreconcilable Differences
Before you continue reading this, go back up and look at Rex Ryan’s quotes. In particular look at the quotes he makes on the structure of the defense, on buying in, and on physicality. With that in mind, think the way Rhodes played this past season. Now mix in Bent’s argument of what made him such an impact player in 2006.
in 2006 – arguably his most productive season – Rhodes was more of a strong safety, but ironically at times, it almost seemed that he had a “free” role, roaming the backfield, stepping up into the box or coming up to the edge at line of scrimmage. This enabled him to contribute in a variety of ways. It’s difficult to determine cause and effect, but the Jets were – on one hand – forced into using Rhodes in this way because Jonathan Vilma was so ineffective inside in the 3-4 and – on the other hand – able to use Rhodes in this way because Vilma was able to hold his own when he dropped back into coverage, which he did with more regularity as the season wore on, almost enabling Rhodes to operate as another linebacker. This is harder to scheme for because you never knew where he was coming from – or going to.
In his interview with us, Rhodes even mentioned his in his 2007 interview with TJB:
TJB: What do you enjoy doing most [in a defense]?
Rhodes: Me? Oh, I prefer to be in a zone. I like to cover when someone gets beat or who slipped coverage and I can provide help, it’s a good feeling. A funny story when I started with the Jets in my rookie year, Donnie Henderson asked me what I wanted to do. I told him, “Coach, let me roam!” Roaming is where I feel most comfortable.
Now think back to those quotes from Rex Ryan and how he phrased his comments. Ed Reed took great advantage of the opportunities allowed him, but it was within Ryan’s structure. I’m not saying that Rhodes went AWOL on that structure, I don’t think that’s the case at all, but I think that (as ironic as it sounds) confined in Ryan’s structure it didn’t play to his skill set. Rhodes isn’t by nature a “boat rocker” so while he tried to play within the system, I think his frustrations internally rose well before it boiled over to the press or Twitter or the like.
That then trickled down into other things like tackling. Rhodes can be a pretty convincing tackler, so what gave in 2009? It sure seemed like malaise to me. How Rhodes was used didn’t allow him to do what he does and likes best, which is to move up and back from the line of scrimmage, to jump routes … to be unpredictable. More often than not, Rhodes repeated what he did in 2008 under Ryan, which was to play centerfield. Rhodes was uncomfortable in his role in 2008, and told his coach so at that time.
… the frustration got to [Rhodes] around mid season, when he noticed “the plays weren’t coming my way.”
He requested a private audience with Mangini, who explained his reasoning behind the strategy. Rhodes declined to give the juicy details, but it seems obvious: With problems at right cornerback – rookie Dwight Lowery started the season and was replaced by graybeard Ty Law – Mangini wanted Rhodes to be a safety net, so to speak, providing deep help.
“Me and Eric talked because I wasn’t happy about it,” said Rhodes, who also had another sit down with Mangini late in the season when everything was crumbling.
Any such reprise in 2009 — which maybe it seemed like it was from his perspective — was unacceptable. While there might have been some similarities from the macro-level, Rhodes admitted that it was the micro-level that was where he felt he was failing in the scheme.
Last year, when he struggled, Rhodes chalked that up to the conservative defensive system run by Eric Mangini, who was fired after the season. Rhodes said he too often played like a center fielder, the last line of defense, minimizing his potential impact.
Ryan’s arrival was supposed to free Rhodes to roam and make the game-changing plays that safety Ed Reed made so often under Ryan in Baltimore in recent seasons.
“I’m not going to make excuses,” Rhodes said. “I have to play better. There are situations in this defense where I revert back to the old defense. We can be playing the same coverage, but little techniques will be different here and there. That is where you will revert back to what you’ve been doing for a while.”
I can’t speak for anyone else, but I know for myself, when I’m not passionate about something from the larger perspective, I’m not that motivated when it comes to the details. Maybe it was the same for Rhodes here.
Visible Cracks Emerge & Camelot Crumbles
With the lack of focus, the “revert[ing] back” as Rhodes put it, things crumbled. As I scanned news from the past year, some of the signs might have been there from the beginning of his time in this new defense, but maybe I just saw it as easily explained it as his adjustment to the new system.
Never one to give up long plays — and granted this was in an APRIL practice (practice?!) — Erik Boland reported in Newaday that Rhodes was out of position on a touchdown to Jerricho Cotchery stemming from Lito Sheppard blowing his coverage. Maybe that’s just one incident and unfair, but it sounds like Rhodes struggled early with the new scheme. Ryan even said so during training camp.
“I think he’s much more comfortable in the system now,” Ryan said about Rhodes recently in camp. “He’s working well with Leonhard. I definitely think he’s going to have a big year for us.”.
But despite any level of comfort in the system that Ryan ascribed to him, Ryan had a mind to use him in his structure, which just didn’t mesh with what Rhodes wanted and as he was relegated to a role that made him more of a help-mate to Darrelle Revis rather than the focus of the defense. As the season wore on, Rhodes seemed less interested in making the plays that were funneled to him, which culminated in the Patriots game in Foxborough where he was roundly criticized for allowing ball carriers to more or less run over him.\
Rhodes was subsequently benched, and fought to make his way back onto the field as a starter. We all know how that went, so I won’t belabor the point, but it’s fair to say with the press asking him and Rex Ryan again and again about his status, it didn’t make smoothing over the issue any easier. Comments were eventually made to the press that were exactly what the press was hoping for, but didn’t help the relationships between player and coach.
Right after his benching though, Rhodes came out and intercepted two passes during the game against the Panthers, whether it was Jake Delhomme’s play (in large part it was) or whether it was the way the team used Rhodes in that game, whatever it might be … Rhodes had to have felt justified in his play after the benching. Rhodes then proceeded to chalk up three interceptions in as many weeks. Maybe in a way the benching stiffened his spine, proving to him that it didn’t matter how much or how little they played him, he was the playmaker he always knew he was. They just weren’t using him the right way.
Tragic Ending
It’s hard to know what’s the story behind the story, but a talented starting player in his prime doesn’t get traded for no reason. I do think that Rex Ryan saw the situation wasn’t working (thus the benching) and I do think that Kerry Rhodes, already trying to fit into a system not suited to him, felt slighted by the benching and was looking to be in a place where he’d be the star piece in a defense — be it in New York or otherwise.
In a break-up or whatever. When one side wants nothing to do with the other, or refuses to acknowledge the problem, as a third party it’s easy to side with the one wholly wronged. To me, the saddest and most tragic endings of broken relationships be it in movies, real life, whatever … are when both sides see there’s a problem and are trying to fix it yet they still end up irreparably broken.
I see that as the case here. Everyone had their reasons to move on, and to stay, and no one seemed able to fix it to stay together.
Rhodes expressed uncertainty, staged a mini-revolt after his benching, but in the end, checked his ego and worked to correct his play down the stretch. Similarly, Ryan tried to reach out to his safety on a personal level. According to Rhodes, he was in constant contact with him to try and work though the issues. Ryan even attended his fundraiser at the Short Hills Mall right before Christmas.
It seemed like whatever damage was done, could be worked through in time … it heals all wounds, doesn’t it? But this is the NFL, and time isn’t something that anyone seems to have much of.
In the end, the dog-years that govern all players, coaches and general managers, seemed to weigh heavily on the decision of what to do, and it seemed best for both sides to move on and seek a situation that was best for all parties. Ryan gets to hand-pick his new safety, and Kerry gets to play with Donnie Henderson again, a coach he asked five years ago to let him roam.
It’s time to roam, Kerry.






Outstanding Article, very easy to see why the Jets went down this road. Forgot about the problems with Mangini, Jets have shown patiance, it was time to cut the cord
Makes sense to me. Thanks for the Big Picture. There were no good guys, there were no bad guys, there was just just Rex and Kerry and they just disagreed.
It looked to me like the benching put the fear of God in Kerry Rhodes, so to speak. On the other hand, Ryan and Tannbaum clearly know what they’re doing in how they retooled this team for last season, so if their opinion is that it’s irreconcilable and Rhodes had to go, I’ll take their word for it.
On the other hand, it looked like to whatever extent the problem existed, it was a scheme problem. It’s not a “Rhodes isn’t good enough” or “Rhodes is a dirtbag” problem. Keeping that in mind, I think that the Jets should have gotten more than a 4th and a 7th.
That much history just walks away? What was it al for then? When you lose that you lose something critical to wining championships.
Very good read, a few points I’d like to add tho are:
#1) his game play decline coincided with the big contract arrival
#2)The trash talking with little done to back it up
#3) his comments on preparing himself for life after football(career wise)……in the middle of a huge contract!!!!
I have nothing to add.
Great job, Bassett.
I will wait until after the draft before I get mad about this. All I will say is now the Jets have a gaping hole in the middle of their defense.
That is about as detailed an article as you can get..
Nice job Bassett!
Slow clap, that article was great.
Really outstanding job summing up the entire saga. Going forward, I think you hit the nail on the head — Rex gets to hand-pick his new safety.
Whoever it is, we all know he he’s going to hit like a truck and wont get run over by the likes of Wes Welker.
interesting article .. but to me motivation, new system whatever the issues were.. he could not tackle nor was he making plays .. this team is about producing and producing to the level of their contract. .. not about the longest tenured (who cares about “history?” – history wins Championships?)
4th round pick is good value – plus unloading that contract.. this is the new Jets ..no one player is more valuable than the whole
That was a heck of an article Bassett. You’d never read anything like that in the newspaper or ESPN.
Props on the article well done! Now lets go out and sign us an Atogwe or a Landry please….
gaping hole? Not quite..
I agree we need someone to replace, but Diggs and Smith have proven to be capable (if it comes to it).
Strong, well-researched, well-written article. Thanks for shedding some light on the circumstances that led to what many consider to be a head-scratcher of a move. Like Vito Corleone said to Virgil Solozzo, best of luck to you so long as your interests don’t conflict with ours…
JetObsessed,
Sorry, but Digs & Smith are in no way capable of replacing the hole in our defense. And it is a sizable hole to replace. I’m not trying to get into it too much, but Rhodes was a huge part of the scheme last year whether people want to admit it or not. It’s not going to be easy to run the same scheme with another safety, and it isn’t possible to run it with either Digs or Smith playing the position.
Just like Parcells had “his guys” so does Rex. And Rhodes most definitely was not one of them.
When i first read the deal i was shocked and annoyed. I have defended Rhodes for most of the season and just thought after the benching things could really work out.
After a day or so I remembered that I trust Rex and the “new” Jet system and Mr T. It did concern me that Rhodes was having difficulty with this coach and his staff. I mean i have never heard a defensive player have an issue in Baltimore…ever.
I will hold my final judgement until all the chips fall into place. I do not think Digs or Smith can do half of what Rhodes did…even in an off year.
I do think they have something else brewing. They have to…There isnt anyway they trade Rhodes without a solid plan to go forward.
I’m really confident Rex will find his next guy. I really think people on this blog need to trust more in the decision making of our front office under this new coaching staff. In Rex, we trust…
Bassett, this article was awesome. You put so many things into perspective and if people actually look at what you’ve written here, it really should clear all doubt. This piece needs to be in the sports section of Times or the Post. Nice work.
Great job. I think its a shame the way Rhodes fell out of favor here.
As I’ve said in other posts:
This was as much about sending a message to the team as anything else.
Rex just told the team that if you play for the Jets you give 110%, and you put the team first. Kerry did neither.
This was really important for Braylon Edwards to see.
I trust Rex. If he didn’t think Rhodes was a fit, so be it. If he thinks they can find a suitable replacement, again, so be it. I have faith that the team has a plan here.
Stellar work as always, BB. It’s pieces like this that separates this site from the rest of the noise out there.
Whatever the history, Ryan didn’t feel that Kerry had the willingness to do everything it took to be the best safety he could be in his defense and, from available evidence, I would agree. Ryan was emphatic about his desire for Rhodes to put in extra hours to work with Dennis Thurman to soak up knowledge about the defense and position in general. I never read any evidence that Rhodes jumped at that opportunity.
I never liked the Ed Reed comparisons, because Reed is a rare player and demonic competitor. Kerry Rhodes, for all his skills and charms, has never demonstrated that driving, desire to be the best at any cost mentality. He’s a nice player. But Rex’s D requires a playmaking safety that can afford to be aggressive because he’s done his homework and sees what’s happening on the field before it materializes. Ryan wants the defensive equivalent of Peyton Manning back there, or at least someone who is devoting every ounce of his energy to trying to become that. That isn’t Kerry Rhodes.
Kerry seems like a nice, fun guy and I wish him well, but to imply that he was in any way a victim of circumstances with the Jets is a poor interpretation of facts
After living with Mangini, you’d think a coach like Rex would be a dream
come true for Rhodes. Nearly all of Rex’s current and former players love playing for the guy. I’m sorry Kerry couldn’t fit in b/c he is a talented player.
To simplysimon2: Oooh, oooh, oooh.. oh ,oh, oh
Nice article Basset. I think you nailed it down, but the question remains ” If we are a SB football team where will Tanny and Rex find their Ed Reed?”
For now we have a big HOLE and I do not see how our secondary got better.
Echo that it’s a great article, Bassett. Interesting that you steered clear of mentioning the compensation they got for Kerry, which I believe was not enough. I am in agreement with those will who sit back and watch what plays out over the offseason, as they must have a solid idea of what to do now. If the plan is to start Smith/Digs, I will be very pissed off and Tanny (whom I currently support wholeheartedly) will drop a peg in my opinion. In general I am not a fan of creating big holes in the offseason, as they have now done with TJ and Kerry. There were compelling reasons to keep both and to let both go, now with them gone the holes they’ve left have to be filled. Again, I trust that Rex/Tanny have a plan to do so.
Obviously creating a hole was not an ideal situation. But it had to be done. Rhodes just didn’t fit here. And its better to cut the cord now then go another season with him and have the same results. With potential for disruption. Get him out and get a new player with a fresh hunger in. Right now, our saftey is not Smith or Digs. IT will be someone not on the roster right now. I have no doubt in my mind.
Cutting TJ…again, had to be done. Cap or no cap, he was/is not worth $5 million anymore. I’m excited to get a new RB in here with fresh legs. We HAVE to keep Leon, which I think we will. He’s the veteran we need at RB. Look for a fresh pair of legs from the draft. The draft is loaded with RBs. I just hope someone signs TJ pronto. We need some UFA-freedom.
Great article Bassett you must have hired a nanny to have the extra time to write it.lol
Goodluck Kerry.
Now Rex go get you a new toy and turn him into an Ed Reed type player.
Starz – someone signing TJ wouldn’t help us to sign an UFA. TJ was cut.
Well researched article, good job, but I don’t buy all the underlying system issues etc, it may have contributed to his slide downward, sure but it was not the real reason for his under achievement.
The correlation between his decline in play and his increase in pay is way too much to ignore. They showed him the money and he went all Hollywood.
Yes, he is very talented, but he lacks a passion for the game, and perhaps lacks true instinct on the field.
As for being tough to replace, I doubt it. We will not miss him one iota, and I state this without knowing who the replacement will be (it will not be eric smith).
It is definately a hole, but bottom line CB is a much tougher position to fill than safety, so the Jets are ahead of the game after what was essentially a trade of Rhodes for Cromartie. The whole at CB is gone, replaced by a hole at S, a position that is much easier to fill.
I remain way more concerned at RB, K and pass rusher than I am safety.
nyc…damn, you’re right. My bad. Wishful thinking I suppose.
The Jets #1 priority should be to sign Atogwe from the Rams. They put the lowest tender on him and thus if we signed him, we wouldnt lose any picks.
This guys is the kind of player rex loves, he makes plays, forces fumbles, is a tackling machine, essentially the polar opposite of Kerry Rhodes.
Ultimately I wanted Rhodes gone, but not if our replacement is a rookie, relying on too many rookies to be standout players normally backfires, with a few exceptions of course.
This team is built to win now, why not get an experienced guy rather than relying on rookies to get you to the promise land….
Good article. I was a huge Kerry fan and somehow that found a way to dwindle down to the point where I could care less that he is gone. But I think Tanny has to stop trading these guys so cheaply (he bot an equivalent of a 5th rd pick for frickin Pete Kendall, but only a fourth and the equivalent of an “8th” rounder for Rhodes) or at least waited until they had a back up plan. Maybe Lowery is the backup plan? I hope they don’t leave a hole in their secondary.
WOJF,
Safety is not an easy position to fill, especially one who would be doing the schematic job that Rhodes did last year.
Great article Bassett. As an aside note, does anyone know if TJB is planning a trip to the draft? I’d be interested if anything is in the works.
Bravo, Bassett.
We had our ups and downs with Kerry as fans, but no real Jet fan can say they won’t miss Kerry even a little. He had some great moments with this team and I wish him well in Arizona.
Now let’s go get a young stud to replace him!
That was fantastic Basset. Kerry was a key part of the old regime, but seemed kind of like a square peg at times in the round hole that is Rex’s D. I just pray the Tanny knows how to fix our current FS situation, and i’d like to point out the Dwight “i really suck” Lowery is not the answer. Bi think in a few weeks we’ll all be talking about what a brilliant move it was by tanny to bring in ________ to play FS. In Tanny we trust.
Great job, Bassett. I liked Kerry and defended his somewhat indifferent and, at times, soft play this season. But, every successful coach has at least one guy that, while talented, just doesn’t fit into his system. Parcells got rid of Hugh Douglas after 1 season. Sure, Hugh wasn’t great in ’97, but he was the Jets’ best pass rusher. He went on to great success with the Eagles and the Jets made the AFC Championship game with a defense that didn’t miss Hugh in the least.
I also think that people are making too much of how hard it will be to replace Rhodes in this defense, in which he did not play all that well. First, Eric Smith will be back barring the unlikely event of his signing an RFA deal that the Jets don’t match. Second, both Digs and Lowery could compete for the position. We’ve seen that Lowery may not have the elite speed necessary for CB, but he’s a solid tackler and has a knack for the big play. Digs is like a 5th LB, although his range seems limited. Maybe the Jets draft a Safety or sign an RFA, but while the Jets may not replace Rhodes with someone as talented, they likely will replace him with someone that fits the defense better. Like with losing Hugh Douglas, it might be more important to get the right cog for the machine, even if it’s not gold-plated.
SD,
I hope that you don’t honestly think any of the 3 guys on our roster (Smith, Digs, Lowery) can replace Rhodes. Smith and Digs have less range than Bart Scott. Lowery could be a good fit, but the guy has never played safety, so to expect him to possibly step into a role he’s never played, ever, and do a solid job isn’t very reliable.
The best option, to me, without trading away picks to move up and take Thomas or Berry in the draft, is trade a 2nd to the Rams and sign Atogwe away from them. Landry from the Ravens doesn’t play free safety, which is the position Rhodes played. People who think he’s replacing Rhodes don’t understand football. Now, if you wanted to say bring in Landry, then slide Leonhard over to FS that would be an idea, but I don’t think it’d be a very good pass covering safety tandem at all.
I’d sign Atogwe, give up the 2nd, and use the first round pick on a pass rusher. That would leave me feeling ok about this trade. But Atogwe, Thomas and Berry all have the physical tools to replace Rhodes (if not completely, at least a good portion of what Rhodes did), but I just don’t see any other real options out there.
also don’t like any of the guys we have on our roster as a real solution to filling the hole Rhodes has left.
Great article, but don’t forget Bryan Thomas has been with us since 2002 and is the 2nd longest tenured Jet.
Well, James Dearth WAS the 2nd longest tenured Jet. But Bassett does clarify for longest “defensive” tenured Jet. So, yeah Bryan Thomas wins that one.
I don’t buy this concern at all. A few points:
1. For most of the season, Kerry Rhodes wasn’t one of 5 best players on our defense.
2. He clearly wasn’t the best safety on this defense.
3. He was due (I believe) a $2M roster bonus.
4. The four best remaining players on our secondary right now are 24, 24, 25, and 27.
5. We got almost as much value from ARI for a safety who’s never made the Pro Bowl as they got for a legitimate star WR in Anquan Boldin.
6. This is a GREAT draft for safeties – Scouts Inc lists 5 safeties in this draft with a grade of 86 or higher. (80 or higher is considered an “outstanding” prospect.)
So remind me again – why is losing Rhodes worth any serious concern?
Tweet from Rhodes
Just landed in AZ it really is the desert!! Lol!
P4P – I don’t agree with all of your points, but I do agree with the overall conclusion that (essentially) releasing him won’t make the walls come tumbling down on last year’s excellent defense. That might surprise some of you, because I’ve defended Kerry’s play as better than thought at various points of the season, but he still underperformed by his previous standards and I always said that if they weren’t prepared to put him with his attitude and felt it would be an ongoing issue, that this would be reason enough to move him.
It IS a concern, because what if his replacement (whoever it may be and for whatever reason) plays badly and weakens the defense overall? Even in a down year, Rhodes played well enough that the defense was number one in the NFL. Of course, there’s every chance that his replacement could outplay him and elevate the defense even more, but that doesn’t stop it being a concern right now when they haven’t even targeted a replacement.
However, I think the defense will be okay. I think it will have a different look next year, but Rex will tweak his system to get the best out of everyone, which is essentially what he did last year too. I guess I’ve based this on my faith in the coaching staff, which may yet prove to be unfounded, but if they get a decent replacement (and I’d prefer a veteran) then I’ll feel pretty comfortable about the defense next year with Jenkins bolstering the front seven that played so well over the second half.
You want to know why Rhodes was traded, watch the Collie TD at 4:39 and the Dallas Clark TD at 6:35. As you will see Rhodes was lost on the Collie TD and he gave Clark way too much room on his TD. Listen to the announcers say where was the safety which was Rhodes on both plays. He allowed 14 pts in a championship game. I am glad he is gone.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d815efc8f/Jets-Colts-highlights
JayM – I’ve watched those clips several times and all I can see is a terrible job in coverage by Eric Smith (got confused and let his man run right by him) on the first play and James Ihedigbo (got fooled by a playfake and hesitated in no man’s land) on the second play. Neither play was Kerry’s fault.
Not a good argument for getting rid of Rhodes without a backup plan in place, so hopefully there is one.
Jay,
You’re joking, right? The TD at 4:39, the pass is lofted right over Leonhard’s head, not Rhodes’. The Clark touchdown seemed to be a miscommunication between Rhodes and the LB (looks like Harris). But you’re going to pull those TWO plays out of a random highlight and say that Rhodes isn’t good. That’s fair.
OK was my bad on the Collie TD. But there have been more bad plays by Rhodes than good. The D Clark TD was Rhodes fault for giving that much room to the tight end with the ball on the 15. I am still glad Rhodes is gone for the embarrass the Pats comment to the lack of tackling on receivers and RB’s. He was not a good safety for this team
JayM,
Ball on the 15, as you can see that Digs (who I thought was Harris originally) doesn’t move. He basically stands in a 3 foot box and just turns around in it. Rhodes is a safety. The first thing a safety does on every play is 3 steps back. LB’s take a step forward, DB’s take 3 steps back unless they’re blitzing. It’s to start moving you in the direction you’ll most likely be moving. That wasn’t Rhodes fault, either.
I still want to know how Rhodes refused to listen to his coaches, how does that work? He knew better than everyone else?
@james, correct, but he was a spot-starter until 2006 :)
I don’t know many magic tricks, but I try to make sure I can pull off the ones I do attempt. :P
Brendan,
No doubt that Rhodes is more talented than E. Smith, Digs or Lowery. But, we have yet to see Cromartie in this defense and we don’t really know what Rex wants from his safeties, besides solid tackling and the ability to step up and make a tackle. My point is, maybe Smith, Digs or Lowery can fit Rex’s defense better than Rhodes could. I’m more positive about Lowery than you are because I think a CB can convert to FS easier than an FS can convert to CB. I hear you, uncertainty leads to fan doubt. But, I’m with Bent. I think Rex has earned the right to choose the players he wants in his system. Also, I agree with Bent that a vet might be the guy Rex wants more than a rookie or the guys on his roster. But, whoever starts at FS will have a chance to be more productive than Rhodes was because he will likely fit Rex’s system better.
Yeah, that all makes sense. I’m very uncomfortable indeed with Smith or Digs, especially from the film study I did because I think they are absolutely awful in coverage. Either one can come into the box in a situational role, but I can’t imagine that next year’s scheme will call for that on every down, unless they intend to play five DBs the whole time.
Lowery is a wild card in all this. If they saw him as a long term option, then I’d like to have thought they’d at least try him out there at some point last season.
Get a vet. Then we can all relax.
Sign Darren Sharper if we lose a FA. He should be able to get double digit INT’s in this system.
Probably not possible, but our secondary would be unreal
You called it. I think he’d want too much money. I’d ideally prefer a longer-term option, I think.
Bent,
When he joined the Ravens, Rod Woodson moved from CB to FS and didn’t skip a beat (4 straight Pro Bowl seasons at FS with the Ravens and Raiders). Relax everyone; I’m joking…Woodson was one of the greatest defensive players of all time and Lowery was nothing like Woodson as a cover CB. But, the transition is possible (even if it took a HOF CB to do it) and Rex saw it up close.
Interesting enough, when Woodson left the Ravens in 2001, the Ravens started 2 rookies at safety: Ed Reed and Will Demps. The results weren’t pretty, but the next season the Ravens signed Corey Fuller to be CB along with McAlister and the defense was elite again, even though Demps and Baxter shared time at free safety (and neither were very good) with Reed at SS. So, with 3/4 of the secondary in good shape, maybe the thing to evaluate is whether having Cromartie replace Lito is more important to the defense than Mr. X replacing Rhodes at FS. I still say that the better the front 7 is at pass rush, the less we have to worry about the FS.
Re: Lowery, I’m not saying it can’t happen, just that I’d feel more comfortable with a proven commodity.
On the pass rush, yes, I agree we need to bolster that. I do think that (a) Jenkins’ return will help Pace, who (after his suspension) didn’t get going until Jenkins was out for the year, to be a bit more dominant and (b) you can get a decent situational rusher in the middle rounds, but I agree that they should address the WILL position (whether that be via the draft or free agency).
Great article, still glad Kerry is gone, can’t let the Ginn TD in Little Cuba go on Monday night. Hollywood blew that coverage and his chances of staying with the Jets on that one.
ESPN TV seems to think Landry is the obvious replacement for Kerry.